These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21141429)
21. Distribution of ozone and other air pollutants in forests of the Carpathian Mountains in central Europe. Bytnerowicz A; Godzik B; Fraczek W; Grodzińska K; Krywult M; Badea O; Barancok P; Blum O; Cerny M; Godzik S; Mankovska B; Manning W; Moravcik P; Musselman R; Oszlanyi J; Postelnicu D; Szdźuj J; Varsavova M; Zota M Environ Pollut; 2002; 116(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 11808553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The use of ambient air quality modeling to estimate individual and population exposure for human health research: a case study of ozone in the Northern Georgia Region of the United States. Bell ML Environ Int; 2006 Jul; 32(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 16516968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the 1-hr and 8-hr National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone using Models-3. Bell M; Ellis H J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Dec; 53(12):1531-40. PubMed ID: 14700139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the Mesoscale Meteorological Model (MM5)-Community Multi-Scale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) performance in hindcast and forecast of ground-level ozone. Nghiem le H; Kim Oanh NT J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Oct; 58(10):1341-50. PubMed ID: 18939781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outdoor/Indoor/Personal ozone exposures of children in Nashville, Tennessee. Lee K; Parkhurst WJ; Xue J; Ozkaynak AH; Neuberg D; Spengler JD J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Mar; 54(3):352-9. PubMed ID: 15061616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Trends and variability of ground-level O3 in Connecticut over the period 1981-1997. Yang J; Miller DR J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Dec; 52(12):1354-61. PubMed ID: 12540041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measurements of ambient ozone using indigo blue-coated filters. Felix EP; de Souza KA; Dias CM; Cardoso AA J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(2):480-5. PubMed ID: 16640297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Overview of surface ozone variability in East Asia-North Pacific region during IGAC/APARE (1994--1996). Lam KS; Wang TJ; Wang T; Tang J; Kajii Y; Liu CM; Shim SG J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 15495964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Understanding the effectiveness of precursor reductions in lowering 8-hr ozone concentrations--Part II. The eastern United States. Reynolds SD; Blanchard CL; Ziman SD J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Nov; 54(11):1452-70. PubMed ID: 15587557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Beryllium-7 measurements in the Houston and Phoenix urban areas: an estimation of upper atmospheric ozone contributions. Gaffney JS; Marley NA; Cunningham MM; Kotamarthi VR J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Aug; 55(8):1228-35. PubMed ID: 16187592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Measurement of microenvironmental ozone concentrations in Durham, North Carolina, using a 2B Technologies 205 Federal Equivalent Method monitor and an interference-free 2B Technologies 211 monitor. Johnson T; Capel J; Ollison W J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):360-71. PubMed ID: 24701694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An operational assessment of the application of the relative reduction factors in the demonstration of attainment of the 8-hr ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. Sistla G; Hogrefe C; Hao W; Ku JY; Zalewsky E; Henry RF; Civerolo K J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Aug; 54(8):950-9. PubMed ID: 15373363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of relative response factor methodology for demonstrating attainment of ozone in Houston, Texas. Vizuete W; Biton L; Jeffries HE; Couzo E J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Jul; 60(7):838-48. PubMed ID: 20681431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of ozone exposures in the greater metropolitan Toronto area. Liu LJ; Koutrakis P; Leech J; Broder I J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1995 Apr; 45(4):223-34. PubMed ID: 7743405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of liquefied petroleum gas on ozone formation in Guadalajara and Mexico City. Jaimes-López JL; Sandoval-Fernández J; González-Ortíz E; Vázquez-García M; González-Macías U; Zambrano-García A J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Jun; 55(6):841-6. PubMed ID: 16022422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ozone exposure assessment in a southern California community. Liu LJ; Delfino R; Koutrakis P Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Jan; 105(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 9074882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Air quality monitoring in Chennai, India, in the summer of 2005. Pulikesi M; Baskaralingam P; Elango D; Rayudu VN; Ramamurthi V; Sivanesan S J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):589-96. PubMed ID: 16442714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Deriving ozone dose-response of photosynthesis in adult forest trees from branch-level cuvette gas exchange assessment. Then C; Löw M; Matyssek R; Wieser G Environ Pollut; 2008 Jun; 153(3):526-8. PubMed ID: 18440679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Characterization of photochemical smog chamber and initial experiments]. Jia L; Xu YF; Shi YZ Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Feb; 32(2):351-61. PubMed ID: 21528554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A multi-objective assessment of an air quality monitoring network using environmental, economic, and social indicators and GIS-based models. Pope R; Wu J J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jun; 64(6):721-37. PubMed ID: 25039205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]