These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21142227)

  • 1. Stoichiometry versus hydrophobicity in protein folding.
    Matthews BW
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):589-91; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stoichiometry-driven protein folding: a comment.
    Agutter PS
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):643-4; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cunning simplicity of a stoichiometry driven protein folding thesis.
    Galzitskaya OV; Lobanov MY; Finkelstein AV
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):595-8; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-range contact preferences and long-range indifference: is protein folding stoichiometry driven?
    Chan HS
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):603-5; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stoichiometry of amino acids drives protein folding?
    Silva CH; Taft CA
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):635-6; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Chargaff's rules" for protein folding: stoichiometric leitmotif made visible.
    Mishra S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):649-52; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does stoichiometry drive protein folding?
    Ventura S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):655-6; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discriminatory power of stoichiometry-driven protein folding?
    Mezei M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):625-6; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is stoichiometry a new metric for evaluating folded proteins?
    Burnett JC; Nguyen TL
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):641-2; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the folding topology of a protein related to its amino acid occurrence?
    Perez JJ
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):657-9; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein structures-based neighborhood analysis vs preferential interactions between the special pairs of amino acids?
    Wang J; Cao Z; Yu J
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):629-32; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stoichiometry in protein folding?: deeper insights may be useful.
    Joshi R
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):667-8; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial profiling of protein hydrophobicity: native vs. decoy structures.
    Zhou R; Silverman BD; Royyuru AK; Athma P
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):561-72. PubMed ID: 12910456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New direction to the solution of protein folding problem.
    Bagchi A; Ghosh TC
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):653-4; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is protein folding still a challenge?
    Nagaraj R
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):639-40; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein folding: grand challenge of nature.
    Mukhopadhyay BP; Bairagya HR
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):637-8; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the importance of amino acid sequence and spatial proximity of interacting residues for protein folding.
    Mitternacht S; Berezovsky IN
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):607-9; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two- and higher point correlation functions in proteins.
    Gruebele M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):615-6; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the information content of protein sequences.
    Rackovsky S; Scheraga HA
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):593-4; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between sequence hydrophobicity and surface-exposure pattern of database proteins.
    Moelbert S; Emberly E; Tang C
    Protein Sci; 2004 Mar; 13(3):752-62. PubMed ID: 14767075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.