These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21142230)

  • 1. The relevance of distance statistics for protein folding.
    Berendsen HJ
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):599-601; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The yeast prion case: could there be a uniform concept underlying complex protein folding?
    Song Y; Song Y; Chen X
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):663-5; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stoichiometry of amino acids drives protein folding?
    Silva CH; Taft CA
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):635-6; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the folding topology of a protein related to its amino acid occurrence?
    Perez JJ
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):657-9; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Entropy capacity determines protein folding.
    Galzitskaya OV; Garbuzynskiy SO
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 16400647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A gradient-directed Monte Carlo approach for protein design.
    Hu X; Hu H; Beratan DN; Yang W
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Aug; 31(11):2164-8. PubMed ID: 20186860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stoichiometry versus hydrophobicity in protein folding.
    Matthews BW
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):589-91; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does stoichiometry drive protein folding?
    Ventura S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):655-6; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein structures-based neighborhood analysis vs preferential interactions between the special pairs of amino acids?
    Wang J; Cao Z; Yu J
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):629-32; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stoichiometry in protein folding?: deeper insights may be useful.
    Joshi R
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):667-8; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New direction to the solution of protein folding problem.
    Bagchi A; Ghosh TC
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):653-4; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminatory power of stoichiometry-driven protein folding?
    Mezei M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):625-6; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is protein folding still a challenge?
    Nagaraj R
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):639-40; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stoichiometry-driven protein folding: a comment.
    Agutter PS
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):643-4; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protein folding: grand challenge of nature.
    Mukhopadhyay BP; Bairagya HR
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):637-8; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the importance of amino acid sequence and spatial proximity of interacting residues for protein folding.
    Mitternacht S; Berezovsky IN
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):607-9; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thermodynamic framework of the interaction between protein and solvent drives protein folding.
    Ramalho TC; da Cunha EF
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):645-6; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are there still surprises buried inside statistical analysis of protein structure?
    Ramanathan R; Verma A
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):661-2; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding the role of the topology in protein folding by computational inverse folding experiments.
    Mucherino A; Costantini S; di Serafino D; D'Apuzzo M; Facchiano A; Colonna G
    Comput Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 32(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 18479970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Chargaff's rules" for protein folding: stoichiometric leitmotif made visible.
    Mishra S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Feb; 28(4):649-52; discussion 669-674. PubMed ID: 21142249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.