These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21142277)

  • 1. Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a seven-step approach.
    Vanni T; Karnon J; Madan J; White RG; Edmunds WJ; Foss AM; Legood R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Jan; 29(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 21142277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a comparison of alternative measures of goodness of fit, parameter search strategies and convergence criteria.
    Karnon J; Vanni T
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Jan; 29(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 21142278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying best-fitting inputs in health-economic model calibration: a Pareto frontier approach.
    Enns EA; Cipriano LE; Simons CT; Kong CY
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Feb; 35(2):170-82. PubMed ID: 24799456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review and critique of modelling in prioritising and designing screening programmes.
    Karnon J; Goyder E; Tappenden P; McPhie S; Towers I; Brazier J; Madan J
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(52):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-145. PubMed ID: 18031651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.
    Stout NK; Knudsen AB; Kong CY; McMahon PM; Gazelle GS
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(7):533-45. PubMed ID: 19663525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies.
    Sculpher MJ; Pang FS; Manca A; Drummond MF; Golder S; Urdahl H; Davies LM; Eastwood A
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Dec; 8(49):iii-iv, 1-192. PubMed ID: 15544708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calibrating Parameters for Microsimulation Disease Models: A Review and Comparison of Different Goodness-of-Fit Criteria.
    van der Steen A; van Rosmalen J; Kroep S; van Hees F; Steyerberg EW; de Koning HJ; van Ballegooijen M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Jul; 36(5):652-65. PubMed ID: 26957567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian Methods for Calibrating Health Policy Models: A Tutorial.
    Menzies NA; Soeteman DI; Pandya A; Kim JJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Jun; 35(6):613-624. PubMed ID: 28247184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration of disease simulation model using an engineering approach.
    Kong CY; McMahon PM; Gazelle GS
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):521-9. PubMed ID: 19900254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiobjective Calibration of Disease Simulation Models Using Gaussian Processes.
    Sai A; Vivas-Valencia C; Imperiale TF; Kong N
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jul; 39(5):540-552. PubMed ID: 31375053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parameter Estimation for Groundwater Models under Uncertain Irrigation Data.
    Demissie Y; Valocchi A; Cai X; Brozovic N; Senay G; Gebremichael M
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):614-25. PubMed ID: 25040235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized parameter estimation and calibration for biokinetic models using correlation and single variable optimisations: Application to sulfate reduction modelling in anaerobic digestion.
    Ahmed W; Rodríguez J
    Water Res; 2017 Oct; 122():407-418. PubMed ID: 28622633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration of individual-based models to epidemiological data: A systematic review.
    Hazelbag CM; Dushoff J; Dominic EM; Mthombothi ZE; Delva W
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 May; 16(5):e1007893. PubMed ID: 32392252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequentially calibrating a Bayesian microsimulation model to incorporate new information and assumptions.
    DeYoreo M; Rutter CM; Ozik J; Collier N
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 35022005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonidentifiability in Model Calibration and Implications for Medical Decision Making.
    Alarid-Escudero F; MacLehose RF; Peralta Y; Kuntz KM; Enns EA
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Oct; 38(7):810-821. PubMed ID: 30248276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impacts of Regulations on Air Quality and Emergency Department Visits in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area, 1999-2013.
    Russell AG; Tolbert P; Henneman L; Abrams J; Liu C; Klein M; Mulholland J; Sarnat SE; Hu Y; Chang HH; Odman T; Strickland MJ; Shen H; Lawal A
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2018 Apr; 2018(195):1-93. PubMed ID: 31883240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Common methodological flaws in economic evaluations.
    Drummond M; Sculpher M
    Med Care; 2005 Jul; 43(7 Suppl):5-14. PubMed ID: 16056003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk assessments and structured care interventions for prevention of foot ulceration in diabetes: development and validation of a prognostic model.
    Crawford F; Chappell FM; Lewsey J; Riley R; Hawkins N; Nicolson D; Heggie R; Smith M; Horne M; Amanna A; Martin A; Gupta S; Gray K; Weller D; Brittenden J; Leese G
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Nov; 24(62):1-198. PubMed ID: 33236718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian calibration of a natural history model with application to a population model for colorectal cancer.
    Whyte S; Walsh C; Chilcott J
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 21127321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.