325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21142740)
1. A review of sutures and other skin closure materials.
Tajirian AL; Goldberg DJ
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2010 Dec; 12(6):296-302. PubMed ID: 21142740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Basic suture materials and suturing techniques.
Ratner D; Nelson BR; Johnson TM
Semin Dermatol; 1994 Mar; 13(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 8155508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture.
Hennessey DB; Carey E; Simms CK; Hanly A; Winter DC
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():168-73. PubMed ID: 22762905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suture materials, 1980s: properties, uses, and abuses.
Swanson NA; Tromovitch TA
Int J Dermatol; 1982 Sep; 21(7):373-8. PubMed ID: 6752052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sutures, needles, and tissue adhesives: a review for dermatologic surgery.
Yag-Howard C
Dermatol Surg; 2014 Sep; 40 Suppl 9():S3-S15. PubMed ID: 25158874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MONOCRYL and DERMABOND vs Staples in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through a Lateral Skin Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Patient-Centered Assessment Tool.
Glennie RA; Korczak A; Naudie DD; Bryant DM; Howard JL
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug; 32(8):2431-2435. PubMed ID: 28438450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a skin adhesive (octyl-2-cyanoacrylate) and the optimum reinforcing combination for suturing wounds.
Chigira M; Akimoto M
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2005; 39(6):334-8. PubMed ID: 16298804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of skin adhesive and absorbable intracutaneous suture for the implantation of cardiac rhythm devices.
Spencker S; Coban N; Koch L; Schirdewan A; Mueller D
Europace; 2011 Mar; 13(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 21075757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal suture materials for contaminated gastrointestinal surgery: does infection influence the decrease of the tensile strength of sutures?
Tanaka Y; Sadahiro S; Ishikawa K; Suzuki T; Kamijo A; Tazume S; Yasuda M
Surg Today; 2012 Dec; 42(12):1170-5. PubMed ID: 22218873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures.
Kim JC; Lee YK; Lim BS; Rhee SH; Yang HC
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Dec; 18(12):2363-9. PubMed ID: 17569012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical properties of suture materials: an important characterization.
Chu CC
Ann Surg; 1981 Mar; 193(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 6260044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Material selection--the basis of successful surgical closure.
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(5):382-3. PubMed ID: 11504455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy.
Sajid MS; Parampalli U; Baig MK; McFall MR
Int J Surg; 2011; 9(8):615-25. PubMed ID: 22061310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Use of absorbable suture material in dermatologic surgery].
Breuninger H; Haueisen S
Z Hautkr; 1985 Mar; 60(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 3922138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model.
Tritle NM; Haller JR; Gray SD
Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1949-51. PubMed ID: 11801975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical corner:a poliglecaprone 25-only approach to wound closure:cosmetic and financial advantages.
Lewin JM; Ostad A; Brauer JA
J Drugs Dermatol; 2013 Mar; 12(3):341-2. PubMed ID: 23545919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suture Products and Techniques: What to Use, Where, and Why.
Regula CG; Yag-Howard C
Dermatol Surg; 2015 Oct; 41 Suppl 10():S187-200. PubMed ID: 26418685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
Walton M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative physical and handling characteristics of novel antibacterial braided silk suture materials.
Chen X; Hou D; Tang X; Wang L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Oct; 50():160-70. PubMed ID: 26143308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
