These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2114331)
21. Cooperative group evaluating diagnostic imaging techniques. Antoine F J Natl Cancer Inst; 1989 Sep; 81(18):1347-9. PubMed ID: 2778820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of imaging modalities in staging the local extent of prostate cancer. Ebert T; Schmitz-Dräger BJ; Bürrig KF; Miller S; Pauli N; Kahn T; Ackermann R Urol Clin North Am; 1991 Aug; 18(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 1877106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparative study of computerized tomography and ultrasound imaging for treatment planning of prostatic carcinoma. Paquette FR; Ahuja AS; Carson PL; Mack LA; Ibbott GS; Johnson ML Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1979 Feb; 5(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 457474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparison of rectal examination, transrectal echography, CAT and MRI in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma]. Montorsi F; Guazzoni G; Consonni P; Colombo R; Nava L; Bergamaschi F; Scattoni V; Rigatti P Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl; 1991 Jun; 63 Suppl 2():143-5. PubMed ID: 1836654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prostatic carcinoma: staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Bezzi M; Kressel HY; Allen KS; Schiebler ML; Altman HG; Wein AJ; Pollack HM Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 3174982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lymphangiography in prostatic carcinoma. Preliminary observations. Castellino RA; Ray G; Blank N; Govan D; Bagshaw M JAMA; 1973 Feb; 223(8):877-81. PubMed ID: 4630700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Staging and follow-up of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: magnetic resonance imaging versus computerized tomography. Olmi P; Fallai C; Colagrande S; Giannardi G Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jun; 32(3):795-800. PubMed ID: 7790266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Clinical application of MRI for urological malignancy. 1: Usefulness of various imaging modalities for local staging of prostatic cancer; a comparison between MRI, CT and transrectal ultrasonography]. Nishimura K; Kita Y; Arai Y; Oishi K; Okada K; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Kakano Y Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Dec; 34(12):2083-9. PubMed ID: 3071121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of carcinomas of the kidney, bladder, and prostate: the role of cross-sectional imaging. Singer J; McClennan BL Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1989 Dec; 10(6):481-97. PubMed ID: 2697358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Magnetic resonance with an endorectal coil and a fast spin echo sequence in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. The correlation with histopathological data]. Masi A; Olmastroni M; Marin E; Consalvo M; Lascialfari L; Ricupero L; Nicita G; Villari D; Amorosi A; Villari N Radiol Med; 1997 Nov; 94(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 9465216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Iversen P; Kjaer L; Thomsen C; Henriksen O Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1987; 104():41-5. PubMed ID: 3481468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Place of the computed tomography in the staging of prostatic cancer. Mazeman E; Lemaître L; Rigot JM; Lambert I Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 243B():55-64. PubMed ID: 3659051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnosis and categorization of the primary tumour in carcinoma of the prostate. Andersson L Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1980; 55():27-30. PubMed ID: 6938032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]