197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21144570)
1. Effectiveness of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA-Vp) for porcine semen analysis.
Rodríguez AL; Rijsselaere T; Bijttebier J; Vyt P; Van Soom A; Maes D
Theriogenology; 2011 Mar; 75(5):972-7. PubMed ID: 21144570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer V equine for equine semen analysis.
Hoogewijs M; De Vliegher S; De Schauwer C; Govaere J; Smits K; Hoflack G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 20965556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods.
Vyt P; Maes D; Rijsselaere T; Dejonckheere E; Castryck F; Van Soom A
Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Dec; 39(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 15598237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
Akashi T; Mizuno I; Okumura A; Fuse H
Arch Androl; 2005; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA II-C) for bull semen analysis.
Hoflack G; Rijsselaere T; Maes D; Dewulf J; Opsomer G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
Reprod Domest Anim; 2005 Jun; 40(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 15943698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
Agarwal A; Sharma RK
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of the parameters obtained by sperm quality analyzer V and computer-aided sperm analysis system].
Ge YF; Wang CH; Shao Y; Yao B; Wu D; Xia XY; Shang XJ; Huang YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Oct; 14(10):923-6. PubMed ID: 19157106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a sperm quality analyser on semen of turkey breeders to monitor storage time effects and age-related changes during a reproductive cycle.
Neuman SL; McDaniel CD; Frank L; Radu J; Hester PY
Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 12195807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates.
Suzuki T; Shibahara H; Tsunoda H; Hirano Y; Taneichi A; Obara H; Takamizawa S; Sato I
Int J Androl; 2002 Feb; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11869377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utilisation of a sperm quality analyser to evaluate sperm quantity and quality of turkey breeders.
Neuman SL; McDaniel CD; Frank L; Radu J; Einstein ME; Hester PY
Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(3):457-64. PubMed ID: 12195806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress.
Sutkeviciene N; Andersson MA; Zilinskas H; Andersson M
Theriogenology; 2005 Feb; 63(3):739-47. PubMed ID: 15629793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of cryopreservation on goat semen characteristics related to sperm freezability.
Dorado J; Muñoz-Serrano A; Hidalgo M
Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Aug; 121(1-2):115-23. PubMed ID: 20462708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality control in boar semen production by use of the FACSCount AF system.
Christensen P; Knudsen DB; Wachmann H; Madsen MT
Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1218-28. PubMed ID: 15325548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sperm chromatin structural integrity in normospermic boars is not related to semen storage and fertility after routine AI.
Waberski D; Schapmann E; Henning H; Riesenbeck A; Brandt H
Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 20961609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation.
Thurston LM; Watson PF; Mileham AJ; Holt WV
J Androl; 2001; 22(3):382-94. PubMed ID: 11330638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo.
Tardif S; Laforest JP; Cormier N; Bailey JL
Theriogenology; 1999 Aug; 52(3):447-59. PubMed ID: 10734379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Vitro Measures for Assessing Boar Semen Fertility.
Jung M; Rüdiger K; Schulze M
Reprod Domest Anim; 2015 Jul; 50 Suppl 2():20-4. PubMed ID: 26174915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additional value of computer assisted semen analysis (CASA) compared to conventional motility assessments in pig artificial insemination.
Broekhuijse ML; Soštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
Theriogenology; 2011 Nov; 76(8):1473-86.e1. PubMed ID: 21872316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of storage duration, storage temperature, and diluent on the viability and fertility of fresh ram sperm.
O'Hara L; Hanrahan JP; Richardson L; Donovan A; Fair S; Evans AC; Lonergan P
Theriogenology; 2010 Mar; 73(4):541-9. PubMed ID: 20004009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
