These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21145027)

  • 1. Retrospective gating vs. prospective triggering for noninvasive coronary angiography: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose using a 256-slice CT scanner with 270 ms gantry rotation.
    Law WY; Yang CC; Chen LK; Huang TC; Lu KM; Wu TH; Mok GS
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 21145027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates.
    Hou Y; Yue Y; Guo W; Feng G; Yu T; Li G; Vembar M; Olszewski ME; Guo Q
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 28(1):153-62. PubMed ID: 21153709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.
    Earls JP; Berman EL; Urban BA; Curry CA; Lane JL; Jennings RS; McCulloch CC; Hsieh J; Londt JH
    Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):742-53. PubMed ID: 18195386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using the 128-slice MDCT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Jeong DW; Choo KS; Baik SK; Kim YW; Jeon UB; Kim JS; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 21498343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
    Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective ECG triggering versus low-dose retrospective ECG-gated 128-channel CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Feng Q; Yin Y; Hua X; Zhu R; Hua J; Xu J
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Oct; 65(10):809-14. PubMed ID: 20797467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of a new motion-correction algorithm on image quality of low-dose coronary CT angiography in patients with insufficient heart rate control.
    Fuchs TA; Stehli J; Dougoud S; Fiechter M; Sah BR; Buechel RR; Bull S; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 24332603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: the effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters.
    Alkadhi H; Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Desbiolles L; Baumüller S; Plass A; Genoni M; Marincek B; Leschka S
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 18976876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice CT angiography to assess coronary artery bypass grafts--comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Lee YW; Yang CC; Mok GS; Law WY; Su CT; Wu TH
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49212. PubMed ID: 23145126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.
    Lee JH; Chun EJ; Choi SI; Vembar M; Lim C; Park KH; Choi DJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jun; 27(5):657-67. PubMed ID: 21678128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Initial experience with prospectively triggered, sequential CT coronary angiography on a 128-slice scanner].
    Anders K; Baum U; Gauss S; Kuefner MA; Achenbach S; Kuettner A; Daniel WG; Uder M; Ropers D
    Rofo; 2009 Apr; 181(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 19291602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of radiation dose, contrast enhancement and image quality of prospective ECG-Gated CT coronary angiography: Single versus dual source CT.
    Liang CR; Ong CC; Chai P; Teo LLS
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):831-839. PubMed ID: 33581989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan.
    Maruyama T; Takada M; Hasuike T; Yoshikawa A; Namimatsu E; Yoshizumi T
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Oct; 52(18):1450-5. PubMed ID: 19017511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: uncompromised quality with markedly reduced radiation exposure in acute chest pain evaluation.
    Goitein O; Beigel R; Matetzky S; Kuperstein R; Brosh S; Eshet Y; Di Segni E; Konen E
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2011 Aug; 13(8):463-7. PubMed ID: 21910369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient radiation dose in prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography and retrospectively gated helical technique with a 320-detector row CT scanner.
    Seguchi S; Aoyama T; Koyama S; Fujii K; Yamauchi-Kawaura C
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5579-85. PubMed ID: 21158269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image Quality of Prospectively ECG-Triggered Coronary CT Angiography in Heart Transplant Recipients.
    Bartykowszki A; Kolossváry M; Jermendy ÁL; Karády J; Szilveszter B; Károlyi M; Balogh O; Sax B; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):314-319. PubMed ID: 29091000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality and radiation dose comparison of prospectively triggered low-dose CCTA: 128-slice dual-source high-pitch spiral versus 64-slice single-source sequential acquisition.
    Ghadri JR; Küest SM; Goetti R; Fiechter M; Pazhenkottil AP; Nkoulou RN; Kuhn FP; Pietsch C; von Schulthess P; Gaemperli O; Templin C; Kaufmann PA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21744246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates.
    Stolzmann P; Goetti R; Baumueller S; Plass A; Falk V; Scheffel H; Feuchtner G; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Leschka S
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20079993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved image quality at 256-slice coronary CT angiography in patients with a high heart rate and coronary artery disease: comparison with 64-slice CT imaging.
    Oda S; Katahira K; Utsunomiya D; Takaoka H; Honda K; Noda K; Oshima S; Yuki H; Namimoto T; Yamashita Y
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1308-14. PubMed ID: 25348474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-dose adaptive sequential scan for dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rate: comparison with retrospective ECG gating.
    Xu L; Yang L; Zhang Z; Li Y; Fan Z; Ma X; Lv B; Yu W
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 19595528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.