These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21145030)

  • 1. Acoustic noise transfer function in clinical MRI a multicenter analysis.
    Hamaguchi T; Miyati T; Ohno N; Hirano M; Hayashi N; Gabata T; Matsui O; Matsushita T; Yamamoto T; Fujiwara Y; Kimura H; Takeda H; Takehara Y
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 21145030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner.
    More SR; Lim TC; Li M; Holland CK; Boyce SE; Lee JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Mar; 23(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 16463341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic noise analysis in echo planar imaging: multicenter trial and comparison with other pulse sequences.
    Miyati T; Banno T; Fujita H; Mase M; Narita H; Imazawa M; Ohba S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Aug; 18(8):733-6. PubMed ID: 10534055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nordell A; Lundh M; Horsch S; Hallberg B; Aden U; Nordell B; Blennow M
    Acta Paediatr; 2009 Aug; 98(8):1278-83. PubMed ID: 19432831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic field strength increase yields significantly greater contrast-to-noise ratio increase: Measured using BOLD contrast in the primary visual area.
    Okada T; Yamada H; Ito H; Yonekura Y; Sadato N
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 15721590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Echo planar imaging at 4 Tesla with minimum acoustic noise.
    Tomasi DG; Ernst T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 12815648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels.
    Moelker A; Wielopolski PA; Pattynama PM
    MAGMA; 2003 Feb; 16(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 12695886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial analysis of acoustic noise transfer function with a human-body phantom in a clinical MRI scanner.
    Hamaguchi T; Miyati T; Ohno N; Matsushita T; Takata T; Matsuura Y; Kobayashi S; Gabata T
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1212-1221. PubMed ID: 35538857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single point imaging with suppressed sound pressure levels through gradient-shape adjustment.
    Latta P; Gruwel ML; Edie E; Srámek M; Tomanek B
    J Magn Reson; 2004 Oct; 170(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 15388078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of acoustic noise during MR imaging: evaluation of six "worst-case" pulse sequences.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli SM; Ziarati M
    Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 8134603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic FMRI noise: linear time-invariant system model.
    Rizzo Sierra CV; Versluis MJ; Hoogduin JM; Duifhuis HD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2115-23. PubMed ID: 18713680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perspectives and limitations of parallel MR imaging at high field strengths.
    Heidemann RM; Seiberlich N; Griswold MA; Wohlfarth K; Krueger G; Jakob PM
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2006 May; 16(2):311-20, xi. PubMed ID: 16731369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise analysis and MR pulse sequence optimization in MREIT using an injected current nonlinear encoding (ICNE) method.
    Kwon OI; Lee BI; Nam HS; Park C
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1391-404. PubMed ID: 17978423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An efficient feedback active noise control algorithm based on reduced-order linear predictive modeling of FMRI acoustic noise.
    Kannan G; Milani AA; Panahi IM; Briggs RW
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Dec; 58(12):3303-9. PubMed ID: 21134809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic variation of off-resonance prepulses for clinical magnetization transfer contrast imaging at 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 tesla.
    Martirosian P; Boss A; Deimling M; Kiefer B; Schraml C; Schwenzer NF; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 18097273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of vibration and acoustic noise in a gradient-coil insert.
    Yao GZ; Mechefske CK; Rutt BK
    MAGMA; 2004 Sep; 17(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 15221661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extraction of overt verbal response from the acoustic noise in a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan by use of segmented active noise cancellation.
    Jung KJ; Prasad P; Qin Y; Anderson JR
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Mar; 53(3):739-44. PubMed ID: 15723385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vital signs and cognitive function are not affected by 23-sodium and 17-oxygen magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain at 9.4 T.
    Atkinson IC; Sonstegaard R; Pliskin NH; Thulborn KR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 20578014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Update of prostate magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T.
    Kim CK; Park BK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 18379296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of passive acoustic screening: implications for the design of imager and MR-suite.
    Moelker A; Vogel MW; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 12541235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.