259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21145332)
1. On the difference between working memory and attentional set.
Olivers CN; Eimer M
Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1553-8. PubMed ID: 21145332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings.
Pratt J; Hommel B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):835-45. PubMed ID: 14585008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When do spatial and visual working memory interact?
Wood JN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):420-39. PubMed ID: 21264717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What goes through the gate? Exploring interference with visual feature binding.
Ueno T; Mate J; Allen RJ; Hitch GJ; Baddeley AD
Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1597-604. PubMed ID: 21185320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attending to unrelated targets boosts short-term memory for color arrays.
Makovski T; Swallow KM; Jiang YV
Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1498-505. PubMed ID: 21145331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
Olivers CN; Meijer F; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1243-65. PubMed ID: 17002535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attentional capture by working memory contents.
Pan Y
Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20565178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
Poole BJ; Kane MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters.
Han SW; Kim MS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1292-302. PubMed ID: 19803637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture.
Soto D; Humphreys GW
Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 19289358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
Kim JI; Humphreys GW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the role of working memory in spatial contextual cueing.
Travis SL; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 22642237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention.
Oberauer K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 12018494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention.
Tong Y; Melara RD
Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1166():110-23. PubMed ID: 17669371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Manipulations of attention dissociate fragile visual short-term memory from visual working memory.
Vandenbroucke AR; Sligte IG; Lamme VA
Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1559-68. PubMed ID: 21236273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
