194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21145778)
1. Percutaneous implants with porous titanium dermal barriers: an in vivo evaluation of infection risk.
Isackson D; McGill LD; Bachus KN
Med Eng Phys; 2011 May; 33(4):418-26. PubMed ID: 21145778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of a porous-structured titanium subdermal barrier for preventing infection in percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses.
Jeyapalina S; Beck JP; Bachus KN; Williams DL; Bloebaum RD
J Orthop Res; 2012 Aug; 30(8):1304-11. PubMed ID: 22294380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Alloplastic Materials and their Propensity to Bacterial Colonisation].
Ballay R; Landor I; Růžička F; Melicherčík P; Tomaides J; Jahoda D
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2016; 83(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 27484073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of metal implants on infection. An experimental study in rabbits.
Cordero J; Munuera L; Folgueira MD
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 Sep; 76(5):717-20. PubMed ID: 8083257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mesenchymal stem cells increase collagen infiltration and improve wound healing response to porous titanium percutaneous implants.
Isackson D; Cook KJ; McGill LD; Bachus KN
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Jun; 35(6):743-53. PubMed ID: 22940446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the porous structure for optimal soft-tissue ingrowth: An in vivo histological study.
Chimutengwende-Gordon M; Dowling R; Pendegrass C; Blunn G
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206228. PubMed ID: 30372471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant-delivered Alendronate Causes a Dose-dependent Response on Net Bone Formation Around Porous Titanium Implants in Canines.
Pura JA; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1224-33. PubMed ID: 26831478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The susceptibility of smooth implant surfaces to periimplant fibrosis and migration of polyethylene wear debris.
Bobyn JD; Jacobs JJ; Tanzer M; Urban RM; Aribindi R; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Brooks CE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Feb; (311):21-39. PubMed ID: 7634577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immediate post-implantation skin immobilization decreases skin regression around percutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic implant systems.
Holt BM; Bachus KN; Beck JP; Bloebaum RD; Jeyapalina S
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Jul; 101(7):2075-82. PubMed ID: 23281016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of pore size, implantation time, and nano-surface properties on rat skin ingrowth into percutaneous porous titanium implants.
Farrell BJ; Prilutsky BI; Ritter JM; Kelley S; Popat K; Pitkin M
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2014 May; 102(5):1305-15. PubMed ID: 23703928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porous PEEK improves the bone-implant interface compared to plasma-sprayed titanium coating on PEEK.
Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Potter D; Safranski DL; Sulchek TA; Gall K; Guldberg RE
Biomaterials; 2018 Dec; 185():106-116. PubMed ID: 30236838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subcutaneous microfabricated surfaces inhibit epithelial recession and promote long-term survival of percutaneous implants.
Chehroudi B; Brunette DM
Biomaterials; 2002 Jan; 23(1):229-37. PubMed ID: 11762842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of soft-tissue response around laser microgrooved titanium percutaneous devices.
Pawar DRL; Jeyapalina S; Bachus KN
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2020 Jul; 108(5):2031-2040. PubMed ID: 31889421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How surface coatings on titanium implants affect keratinized tissue: A systematic review.
Van den Borre CE; Zigterman BGR; Mommaerts MY; Braem A
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Jul; 110(7):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 35103386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and histologic response of subcutaneous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) and porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor) implants to acute and early infection.
Sclafani AP; Thomas JR; Cox AJ; Cooper MH
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Mar; 123(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9076241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants.
Dalton JE; Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 7822360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioactive porous titanium: an alternative to surgical implants.
de Medeiros WS; de Oliveira MV; Pereira LC; de Andrade MC
Artif Organs; 2008 Apr; 32(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 18370941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone bonding strength of diamond-structured porous titanium-alloy implants manufactured using the electron beam-melting technique.
Hara D; Nakashima Y; Sato T; Hirata M; Kanazawa M; Kohno Y; Yoshimoto K; Yoshihara Y; Nakamura A; Nakao Y; Iwamoto Y
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Feb; 59():1047-1052. PubMed ID: 26652463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect on infection resistance of a local antiseptic and antibiotic coating on osteosynthesis implants: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Kälicke T; Schierholz J; Schlegel U; Frangen TM; Köller M; Printzen G; Seybold D; Klöckner S; Muhr G; Arens S
J Orthop Res; 2006 Aug; 24(8):1622-40. PubMed ID: 16779814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vitamin E Phosphate Coating Stimulates Bone Deposition in Implant-related Infections in a Rat Model.
Lovati AB; Bottagisio M; Maraldi S; Violatto MB; Bortolin M; De Vecchi E; Bigini P; Drago L; Romanò CL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1324-1338. PubMed ID: 29771856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
