BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21145901)

  • 1. Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: a computational approach.
    Kyllingsbæk S; Sy JL; Giesbrecht B
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1487-97. PubMed ID: 21145901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Bühler M; Menz MM; Rose M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 19302005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The capacity of attention and simultaneous perception of objects: a group study of Huntington's disease patients.
    Finke K; Schneider WX; Redel P; Dose M; Kerkhoff G; Müller HJ; Bublak P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3272-84. PubMed ID: 17681560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load.
    Yi DJ; Woodman GF; Widders D; Marois R; Chun MM
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 7(9):992-6. PubMed ID: 15286791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.
    He J; McCarley JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing.
    Wilson DE; Muroi M; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):319-35. PubMed ID: 21299322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of biased competition in visual short-term memory.
    Shapiro KL; Miller CE
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1506-17. PubMed ID: 21335016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induced gamma-band activity elicited by visual representation of unattended objects.
    Martinovic J; Gruber T; Ohla K; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 18476754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness.
    Cartwright-Finch U; Lavie N
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):321-40. PubMed ID: 16480973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings.
    Pratt J; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):835-45. PubMed ID: 14585008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inspection time and visual-perceptual processing.
    Garaas TW; Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):523-37. PubMed ID: 18191437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.