These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21147135)

  • 1. Focused visual attention distorts distance perception away from the attentional locus.
    Wardak C; Denève S; Ben Hamed S
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):535-45. PubMed ID: 21147135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Varying the scope of attention alters the encoding of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Borst G; Kosslyn SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2769-72. PubMed ID: 20434469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load.
    Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in orientation discrimination at the time of saccadic eye movements.
    Lee J; Lee C
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2213-23. PubMed ID: 18625267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder involves differential cortical processing in a visual spatial attention paradigm.
    López V; López-Calderón J; Ortega R; Kreither J; Carrasco X; Rothhammer P; Rothhammer F; Rosas R; Aboitiz F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2540-8. PubMed ID: 17000133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 15907299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic allocation of visual attention during the execution of sequences of saccades.
    Gersch TM; Kowler E; Dosher B
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1469-83. PubMed ID: 15066405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the spatial interaction of visual working memory and attention: evidence for a global effect from memory-guided saccades.
    Herwig A; Beisert M; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):8. PubMed ID: 20616119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The representation of spatial attention in human parietal cortex dynamically modulates with performance.
    Huddleston WE; DeYoe EA
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Jun; 18(6):1272-80. PubMed ID: 17962221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences.
    Godijn R; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):882-96. PubMed ID: 14585012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.