78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21147510)
1. Socioeconomic inequalities in the diffusion of health technology: Uptake of coronary procedures as an example.
Korda RJ; Clements MS; Dixon J
Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jan; 72(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 21147510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Universal health care no guarantee of equity: comparison of socioeconomic inequalities in the receipt of coronary procedures in patients with acute myocardial infarction and angina.
Korda RJ; Clements MS; Kelman CW
BMC Public Health; 2009 Dec; 9():460. PubMed ID: 20003401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry.
Maynard C; Litwin PE; Martin JS; Weaver WD
Arch Intern Med; 1992 May; 152(5):972-6. PubMed ID: 1580724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Universal health insurance coverage does not eliminate inequities in access to cardiac procedures after acute myocardial infarction.
Pilote L; Joseph L; Bélisle P; Penrod J
Am Heart J; 2003 Dec; 146(6):1030-7. PubMed ID: 14660995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional volumes and coronary angioplasty outcomes before and after the introduction of stenting.
Maynard C; Every NR; Chapko MK; Ritchie JL
Eff Clin Pract; 1999; 2(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 10538258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gender and age inequity in the provision of coronary revascularisation in England in the 1990s: is it getting better?
Shaw M; Maxwell R; Rees K; Ho D; Oliver S; Ben-Shlomo Y; Ebrahim S
Soc Sci Med; 2004 Dec; 59(12):2499-507. PubMed ID: 15474204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-hospital time to treatment of patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: determinants and outcome. Results from the registry of percutaneous coronary interventions in acute myocardial infarction of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausarzte.
Zahn R; Vogt A; Zeymer U; Gitt AK; Seidl K; Gottwik M; Weber MA; Niederer W; Mödl B; Engel HJ; Tebbe U; Senges J;
Heart; 2005 Aug; 91(8):1041-6. PubMed ID: 16020592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variation in the use of cardiac procedures after acute myocardial infarction.
Guadagnoli E; Hauptman PJ; Ayanian JZ; Pashos CL; McNeil BJ; Cleary PD
N Engl J Med; 1995 Aug; 333(9):573-8. PubMed ID: 7623908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proliferation of cardiac technology in Canada: a challenge to the sustainability of Medicare.
Alter DA; Stukel TA; Newman A
Circulation; 2006 Jan; 113(3):380-7. PubMed ID: 16432069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of previous coronary-artery bypass surgery on the prognosis of patients with diabetes who have acute myocardial infarction. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Investigators.
Detre KM; Lombardero MS; Brooks MM; Hardison RM; Holubkov R; Sopko G; Frye RL; Chaitman BR
N Engl J Med; 2000 Apr; 342(14):989-97. PubMed ID: 10749960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of age on management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).
Avezum A; Makdisse M; Spencer F; Gore JM; Fox KA; Montalescot G; Eagle KA; White K; Mehta RH; Knobel E; Collet JP;
Am Heart J; 2005 Jan; 149(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 15660036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Community factors, hospital characteristics and inter-regional outcome variations following acute myocardial infarction in Canada.
Alter DA; Austin PC; Tu JV;
Can J Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 21(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 15776114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State and Ontario.
Ko DT; Tu JV; Samadashvili Z; Guo H; Alter DA; Cantor WJ; Hannan EL
Circulation; 2010 Jun; 121(24):2635-44. PubMed ID: 20529997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of treatment and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction in Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, and Göteborg, Sweden.
Herlitz J; McGovern P; Dellborg M; Karlsson T; Duval S; Karlson BW; Lee S; Luepker RV
Am Heart J; 2003 Dec; 146(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 14660994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Innovation, centralization, and growth. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Manitoba.
Roos LL; Sharp SM
Med Care; 1989 May; 27(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 2786119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Education-related variation in coronary procedure rates and the contribution of private health care in Australia: a prospective cohort study.
Hughes V; Paige E; Welsh J; Joshy G; Banks E; Korda RJ
Int J Equity Health; 2020 Aug; 19(1):139. PubMed ID: 32795313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of acute coronary syndrome on clinical, economic, and cardiac-specific health status after coronary artery bypass surgery versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year results from the stent or surgery (SoS) trial.
Zhang Z; Spertus JA; Mahoney EM; Booth J; Nugara F; Stables RH; Weintraub WS
Am Heart J; 2005 Jul; 150(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 16084166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Area socioeconomic status and mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the role of hospital volume.
Kim C; Diez Roux AV; Hofer TP; Nallamothu BK; Bernstein SJ; Rogers MA
Am Heart J; 2007 Aug; 154(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 17643593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of early coronary artery bypass graft in an unselected acute coronary syndrome patient population.
Monteiro P;
Circulation; 2006 Jul; 114(1 Suppl):I467-72. PubMed ID: 16820620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Socioeconomic disadvantage and acute coronary events: a spatiotemporal analysis.
Beard JR; Earnest A; Morgan G; Chan H; Summerhayes R; Dunn TM; Tomaska NA; Ryan L
Epidemiology; 2008 May; 19(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 18414088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
