These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21148612)

  • 1. Exploring the neural dynamics underpinning individual differences in sentence comprehension.
    Prat CS; Just MA
    Cereb Cortex; 2011 Aug; 21(8):1747-60. PubMed ID: 21148612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in sentence comprehension: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic and lexical processing demands.
    Prat CS; Keller TA; Just MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1950-63. PubMed ID: 17892384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.
    Fiebach CJ; Vos SH; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1562-75. PubMed ID: 15601519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of individual differences in working memory capacity on sentence comprehension: an FMRI study.
    Newman SD; Malaia E; Seo R; Cheng H
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):458-67. PubMed ID: 23124385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An fMRI investigation of analogical mapping in metaphor comprehension: the influence of context and individual cognitive capacities on processing demands.
    Prat CS; Mason RA; Just MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):282-94. PubMed ID: 22122242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neural basis of executive function in working memory: an fMRI study based on individual differences.
    Osaka N; Osaka M; Kondo H; Morishita M; Fukuyama H; Shibasaki H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):623-31. PubMed ID: 14980565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.
    Bahlmann J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Rotte M; Münte TF
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):940-9. PubMed ID: 17274018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events.
    Farmer TA; Fine AB; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):413-433. PubMed ID: 26652283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Fingerprints Underlying Individual Language Learning Profiles.
    Feng G; Ou J; Gan Z; Jia X; Meng D; Wang S; Wong PCM
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(35):7372-7387. PubMed ID: 34301824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities.
    Payne BR; Grison S; Gao X; Christianson K; Morrow DG; Stine-Morrow EA
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 24291806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Specialization in the left prefrontal cortex for sentence comprehension.
    Hashimoto R; Sakai KL
    Neuron; 2002 Aug; 35(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 12165479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural processing during older adults' comprehension of spoken sentences: age differences in resource allocation and connectivity.
    Peelle JE; Troiani V; Wingfield A; Grossman M
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Apr; 20(4):773-82. PubMed ID: 19666829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in verbal working memory underlie a tradeoff between semantic and structural processing difficulty during language comprehension: An ERP investigation.
    Kim AE; Oines L; Miyake A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):406-420. PubMed ID: 28933902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large-scale neural network for sentence processing.
    Cooke A; Grossman M; DeVita C; Gonzalez-Atavales J; Moore P; Chen W; Gee J; Detre J
    Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):14-36. PubMed ID: 16168473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alignment of alpha-band desynchronization with syntactic structure predicts successful sentence comprehension.
    Vassileiou B; Meyer L; Beese C; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():286-296. PubMed ID: 29627592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children's verbal working memory: role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension.
    Magimairaj BM; Montgomery JW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):669-82. PubMed ID: 22223892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension.
    Van Dyke JA; Johns CL; Kukona A
    Cognition; 2014 Jun; 131(3):373-403. PubMed ID: 24657820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.
    Caplan D; Waters GS
    Behav Brain Sci; 1999 Feb; 22(1):77-94; discussion 95-126. PubMed ID: 11301522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning.
    Sauppe S; Choudhary KK; Giroud N; Blasi DE; Norcliffe E; Bhattamishra S; Gulati M; Egurtzegi A; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Meyer M; Bickel B
    PLoS Biol; 2021 Jan; 19(1):e3001038. PubMed ID: 33497384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential components of sentence comprehension: beyond single word reading and memory.
    Cutting LE; Clements AM; Courtney S; Rimrodt SL; Schafer JG; Bisesi J; Pekar JJ; Pugh KR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 16253527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.