143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21150003)
1. Publishing in learned journals.
Arseculeratne SN
Indian J Med Res; 2010 Nov; 132(5):525-6. PubMed ID: 21150003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns.
Satyanarayana K; Sharma A
Indian J Med Res; 2010 Aug; 132():119-22. PubMed ID: 20716810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
Glimelius B
Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advancing the Rigour and Integrity of Our Science: The Registered Reports Initiative.
Probst TM; Hagger MS
Stress Health; 2015 Aug; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 26250351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The multiple faces of journal peer review.
Thatje S
Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Mar; 97(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 20127306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A reader and author respond to "The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it".
Jones V
Medscape J Med; 2009; 11(1):17; author reply 17. PubMed ID: 19295938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Citation marketing and networking.
Couée I
Naturwissenschaften; 2011 Aug; 98(8):717-8. PubMed ID: 21656200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical editor lambasts journals and editors.
Smith R
BMJ; 2001 Sep; 323(7314):651. PubMed ID: 11566822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Avoiding predatory journals: Quick peer review processes too good to be true.
Edie AH; Conklin JL
Nurs Forum; 2019 Jul; 54(3):336-339. PubMed ID: 30802310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review: the cornerstone of scientific publishing integrity.
Hillard T; Baber R
Climacteric; 2021 Apr; 24(2):107-108. PubMed ID: 33645415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem.
Evans JT; Nadjari HI; Burchell SA
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1353-4. PubMed ID: 2304213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Why and how articles are accepted or rejected for publication in biomedical journals].
Trilla A
Med Clin (Barc); 1990 Dec; 95(19):732-4. PubMed ID: 2087121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?
Lüscher TF; Gersh B; Hindricks G; Landmesser U; Nallamothu B; Ruschitzka F; Wijns W
Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 23132609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Strengthening the peer review process for the International Journal of Toxicology.
Brock WJ
Int J Toxicol; 2014; 33(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 25436270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts.
Balistreri WF
J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 17643754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
Tarkang EE; Bain LE
Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
