These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. How does peer review work? Aaron L Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns. Satyanarayana K; Sharma A Indian J Med Res; 2010 Aug; 132():119-22. PubMed ID: 20716810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017. Glimelius B Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advancing the Rigour and Integrity of Our Science: The Registered Reports Initiative. Probst TM; Hagger MS Stress Health; 2015 Aug; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 26250351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The multiple faces of journal peer review. Thatje S Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Mar; 97(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 20127306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal. Liesegang TJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tips for writing and publishing an article. Nahata MC Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A reader and author respond to "The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it". Jones V Medscape J Med; 2009; 11(1):17; author reply 17. PubMed ID: 19295938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Citation marketing and networking. Couée I Naturwissenschaften; 2011 Aug; 98(8):717-8. PubMed ID: 21656200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical editor lambasts journals and editors. Smith R BMJ; 2001 Sep; 323(7314):651. PubMed ID: 11566822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Avoiding predatory journals: Quick peer review processes too good to be true. Edie AH; Conklin JL Nurs Forum; 2019 Jul; 54(3):336-339. PubMed ID: 30802310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond peer review: rethinking scientific publishing with artificial intelligence. Al Barajraji M; Niset A; Englebert A; El Hadwe S; Barrit S Intensive Care Med; 2024 Oct; 50(10):1715-1716. PubMed ID: 39052069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review: the cornerstone of scientific publishing integrity. Hillard T; Baber R Climacteric; 2021 Apr; 24(2):107-108. PubMed ID: 33645415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem. Evans JT; Nadjari HI; Burchell SA JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1353-4. PubMed ID: 2304213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Why and how articles are accepted or rejected for publication in biomedical journals]. Trilla A Med Clin (Barc); 1990 Dec; 95(19):732-4. PubMed ID: 2087121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved? Lüscher TF; Gersh B; Hindricks G; Landmesser U; Nallamothu B; Ruschitzka F; Wijns W Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 23132609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Strengthening the peer review process for the International Journal of Toxicology. Brock WJ Int J Toxicol; 2014; 33(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 25436270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]