79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21150451)
1. Performance assessment of four 64-slice computed tomographic devices for a typical clinical protocol.
Colli V; Mangini M; Strocchi S; Lumia D; Canì A; Boffano C; Cesarani F; Rizzi E; Ferrara RM; Andreis IA; Bruno J; Gozzi G; Cacciatori M; Ostinelli A; Vite C; Conte L; Fugazzola C
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 21150451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Radiation exposure in single slice and multi-slice spiral CT (a phantom study)].
Giacomuzzi SM; Torbica P; Rieger M; Lottersberger C; Peer S; Peer R; Perkmann R; Buchberger W; Bale R; Mallouhi A; Jaschke W
Rofo; 2001 Jul; 173(7):643-9. PubMed ID: 11512238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of correlated dose and sensitivity profiles on a multi-slice CT scanner.
Bahar Gogani J; Hägglund P; Wickman G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):332-6. PubMed ID: 15933132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The evaluation of the physical characteristics of a volumetric computer tomograph].
Crespi A; Leoni S; Montanari G; Paruccini N; Pedroli G; Grimaldi M; Salvini E
Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 8643860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Multi-slice CT scanners].
Yu XE; Kang LL; Yang JJ
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2001 Jul; 25(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 12583224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abdominal multislice CT for obese patients: effect on image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Lee ER; Delong DM; Ngyen G; Toncheva G; Yoshizumi TT
Acad Radiol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 17368219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.
Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography].
Becker C; Schätzl M; Feist H; Bäuml A; Schöpf UJ; Michalski G; Lechel U; Hengge M; Brüning R; Reiser M
Rofo; 1999 Jan; 170(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 10071653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose reduction for CT pediatric imaging.
Morgan HT
Pediatr Radiol; 2002 Oct; 32(10):724-8; discussion 751-4. PubMed ID: 12244462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient dose evaluation and optimization of uropoietic multiphasic multislice CT examination.
Isoardi P; Ropolo R; Savio L; Cesarani F; Marchisio F; Gandini G
Radiol Med; 2004 Mar; 107(3):218-28. PubMed ID: 15031686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT radiation dose and image quality.
Payne JT
Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Nov; 43(6):953-62, vii. PubMed ID: 16253656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT dose optimization when changing to CT multi-detector row technology.
Verdun FR; Gutierrez D; Schnyder P; Aroua A; Bochud F; Gudinchet F
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2007; 36(4):176-84. PubMed ID: 17601537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality.
Goldman LW
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):213-25; quiz 226-8. PubMed ID: 18006597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Radiation exposure of the head, midface and pelvis in multi-slice CT (MSCT): comparison with single-slice CT (SSCT)].
Wedegärtner U; Thurmann H; Schmidt R; Adam G
Rofo; 2003 Feb; 175(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 12584624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two types of adult phantoms in terms of organ doses from diagnostic CT procedures.
Liu H; Gu J; Caracappa PF; Xu XG
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1441-51. PubMed ID: 20150686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of radiation exposure of prospectively triggered 128-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.
Ketelsen D; Buchgeister M; Fenchel M; Thomas C; Boehringer N; Tsiflikas I; Kaempf M; Syha R; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
Rofo; 2010 Dec; 182(12):1105-9. PubMed ID: 21104597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements.
Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 19074786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
