236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21150625)
21. Value of intracochlear electrically evoked auditory brainstem response after cochlear implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canal.
Song MH; Bae MR; Kim HN; Lee WS; Yang WS; Choi JY
Laryngoscope; 2010 Aug; 120(8):1625-31. PubMed ID: 20564653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Oto-neuro-surgical approach and accessibility to the cochlear nuclei. Significance in auditory brain stem implant].
Vautrin R; Mertens P; Streichenberger N; Ceruse P; Truy E
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 9770063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perioperative electrical auditory brain stem response in candidates for pediatric cochlear implantation.
Mason SM; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP; Garnham CW; Jowett CA
Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 9233487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cochlear implantation in patients with auditory neuropathy of varied etiologies.
Mason JC; De Michele A; Stevens C; Ruth RA; Hashisaki GT
Laryngoscope; 2003 Jan; 113(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12514381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Value of auditory evoked potentials of the brain stem in patients with a Digisonic cochlear implant].
Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Berger-Vachon C; Morgon A
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1997; 114(4):116-24. PubMed ID: 9686020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
Pasanisi E; Vincenti V; Bacciu A; Guida M; Bacciu S
Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of cochlear nuclei during central auditive implant setting].
Alegre M; Iriarte J; Manrique M; Huarte A; Vanaclocha V; Artieda J
Rev Neurol; 1999 Aug 1-15; 29(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 10797901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.
Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process.
Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Fryauf-Bertschy H; Kelsay D; Gantz BJ
Ear Hear; 1994 Apr; 15(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 8020649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes.
Mason S
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S33-8. PubMed ID: 15732380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?
Colletti V; Shannon RV
Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1974-8. PubMed ID: 16319608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Responses in Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implants: Morphological Characteristics, Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Stimulation Level, and Association with Auditory Detection.
He S; McFayden TC; Teagle HF; Ewend M; Henderson L; Buchman CA
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):634-649. PubMed ID: 27579988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implantation of children with inner ear malformations.
Kim AH; Kileny PR; Arts HA; El-Kashlan HK; Telian SA; Zwolan TA
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):626-34. PubMed ID: 18520627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cochlear implantation results in patients with Kearns-Sayre syndrome.
Pijl S; Westerberg BD
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):472-5. PubMed ID: 18382375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Monitoring the electrode position during acoustic neuroma surgery.
Frohne C; Lesinski A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S95-6. PubMed ID: 9391615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
