95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21150981)
1. Time to underpin Wikipedia wisdom.
Bateman A; Logan DW
Nature; 2010 Dec; 468(7325):765. PubMed ID: 21150981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Wikipedia rival calls in the experts.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7111):493. PubMed ID: 17024058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head.
Giles J
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7070):900-1. PubMed ID: 16355180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dentistry in Wikipedia: A quantitative and qualitative analysis].
Lorenz A; Türp JC
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2010; 120(12):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21261123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using wikis as an online health information resource.
Younger P
Nurs Stand; 2010 May 12-18; 24(36):49-56; quiz 58. PubMed ID: 20527486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wiki's wild world.
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7070):890. PubMed ID: 16355169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Wikipedia and wikinutrition: key tools for the global promotion of nutrition].
Sanz-Valero J; Wanden-Berghe C; Culebras-Fernández JM; Gil A; Ruiz MD; Luengo LM; Veiga J;
Nutr Hosp; 2012; 27(5):1375-9. PubMed ID: 23478681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Despite some flaws, online submission is the future.
Hsieh YH
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7046):1160. PubMed ID: 15988494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of pharmacist use and perception of Wikipedia as a drug information resource.
Brokowski L; Sheehan AH
Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1912-3. PubMed ID: 19843833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Experts plan to reclaim the web for pop science.
Butler D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):516-7. PubMed ID: 16452941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Intellectual interchanges in the history of the massive online open-editing encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Yun J; Lee SH; Jeong H
Phys Rev E; 2016 Jan; 93(1):012307. PubMed ID: 26871092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No rest for the bio-wikis.
Callaway E
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7322):359-60. PubMed ID: 21085149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Wikipedia--challenges and new horizons in enhancing medical education.
Herbert VG; Frings A; Rehatschek H; Richard G; Leithner A
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():32. PubMed ID: 25879421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introduction to anatomy on Wikipedia.
Ledger TS
J Anat; 2017 Sep; 231(3):430-432. PubMed ID: 28703298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Authors say that they prefer online submission.
Ware M
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):559. PubMed ID: 15800593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Wikipedia use.
Shawkat E
Br Dent J; 2009 Feb; 206(3):117. PubMed ID: 19218928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proceed with caution: using Wikipedia as a reference.
Taylor-Mendes C
Neonatal Netw; 2007; 26(3):140-1. PubMed ID: 17521060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Wikipedia use amongst medical students - new insights into the digital revolution.
Allahwala UK; Nadkarni A; Sebaratnam DF
Med Teach; 2013 Apr; 35(4):337. PubMed ID: 23137251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Wikipedia: proceed with caution.
Fitterling L
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 May; 114(5):334-5. PubMed ID: 24777995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The readability of the English Wikipedia article on Parkinson's disease.
Brigo F; Erro R
Neurol Sci; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1045-6. PubMed ID: 25596713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
