174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2115244)
1. Preston M. Hickey memorial lecture. Ionic and nonionic iodinated contrast media: evolution and strategies for use.
McClennan BL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Aug; 155(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 2115244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents.
Dawson P
Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8282499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deaths related to iodinated contrast media reported spontaneously to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1978-1994: effect of the availability of low-osmolality contrast media.
Spring DB; Bettmann MA; Barkan HE
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 9240516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-osmolality contrast media: premises and promises.
McClennan BL
Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3786748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media. Can economic analysis determine the real worth of a new technology?
Henry DA; Evans DB; Robertson J
Med J Aust; 1991 Jun; 154(11):766-72. PubMed ID: 1828529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravascular contrast media. Ionic versus nonionic: current status.
McClennan BL; Stolberg HO
Radiol Clin North Am; 1991 May; 29(3):437-54. PubMed ID: 2023999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative cytotoxicity of high-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media on HKCs in vitro.
Duan S; Zhou X; Liu F; Peng Y; Chen Y; Pei Y; Ling G; Zhou L; Li Y; Pi Y; Tang K; Liu R; Li G
J Nephrol; 2006; 19(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 17173243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E
N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonfatal adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media: spontaneous reporting to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1978-1994.
Spring DB; Bettmann MA; Barkan HE
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 9240515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.
Swanson DP; Thrall JH; Shetty PC
Clin Pharm; 1986 Nov; 5(11):877-91. PubMed ID: 3780159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative tolerability of contrast media used for coronary interventions.
Esplugas E; Cequier A; Gomez-Hospital JA; Del Blanco BG; Jara F
Drug Saf; 2002; 25(15):1079-98. PubMed ID: 12452733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Iodinated radiographic contrast media: comparison of low-osmolar with conventional ionic agents [corrected].
Rubin JD; Cohan RH
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Oct; 3(5):637-45. PubMed ID: 1931499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The effects of contrast media on the cardiac conducting system in coronary angiography].
Kawamori J
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov; 49(11):1372-81. PubMed ID: 2602100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical and economic considerations in using a new contrast medium.
Fischer HW; Spataro RF; Rosenberg PM
Arch Intern Med; 1986 Sep; 146(9):1717-21. PubMed ID: 3092757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-induced nephropathy: are there differences between low osmolar and iso-osmolar iodinated contrast media?
Morcos SK
Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 19348841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-osmolality contrast media: a current perspective.
King BF; Hartman GW; Williamson B; LeRoy AJ; Hattery RR
Mayo Clin Proc; 1989 Aug; 64(8):976-85. PubMed ID: 2677533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Influence of high- and low-osmolality contrast media on renal function in children].
Chen CY; Cao L; Chen DK; Chu M; Tu J
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 44(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 16780650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wangsuphachart S
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiographic contrast media: an introduction to its use, adverse-effect profile, and economic impact.
Gersema LM
J Pharm Technol; 1993; 9(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 10123761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media: a prospective study of the effect of rapid bolus injection on nausea and anaphylactoid reactions.
Federle MP; Willis LL; Swanson DP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 9606371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
