389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21152844)
1. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Al-Ibraheemi Z; Brustman L; Bimson BE; Porat N; Rosenn B
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 29215514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial.
Abdi N; Alavi A; Pakbaz F; Darabi H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jul; 21(1):533. PubMed ID: 34315413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.
Kamarudzman N; Omar SZ; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101142. PubMed ID: 37643690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction.
Chavakula PR; Benjamin SJ; Abraham A; Londhe V; Jeyaseelan V; Mathews JE
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 May; 129(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 25661322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction.
El-Khayat W; Alelaiw H; El-kateb A; Elsemary A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 25694257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening.
Sciscione AC; Nguyen L; Manley J; Pollock M; Maas B; Colmorgen G
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 97(4):603-7. PubMed ID: 11275035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term.
Abramovici D; Goldwasser S; Mabie BC; Mercer BM; Goldwasser R; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1108-12. PubMed ID: 10561627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
