These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21154001)

  • 1. What are we confident about?
    Bangdiwala SI
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2010 Dec; 17(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 21154001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative results and the limitations of power.
    Penington A
    ANZ J Surg; 2008; 78(1-2):99-102. PubMed ID: 18199219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
    Corty EW; Corty RW
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Basic philosophy of statistical tests, confidence intervals and sample size determination.
    Indrayan A; Satyanarayana L
    Indian Pediatr; 2000 Jul; 37(7):739-51. PubMed ID: 10906806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of small health risks based on exact sample sizes.
    Abt K; Gülich A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 8614754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance or relevance: what do you use in large samples? About p values, confidence intervals, and effect sizes.
    Veldhuizen I; Pasker-De Jong P; Atsma F
    Transfusion; 2012 Jun; 52(6):1169-71. PubMed ID: 22168259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of quantitative research data: Part 2.
    Banks S
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Jul; 14(10):710-3. PubMed ID: 10481722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: a robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case.
    Algina J; Keselman HJ; Penfield RD
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16221031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical tools in the quest for truth: hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, and the power of clinical studies.
    Smith SD
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):423-4. PubMed ID: 18319103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of the Fieller-Hinkley distribution of the ratio of random variables in testing for noninferiority.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 17365219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size calculations in randomized trials: common pitfalls.
    Brasher PM; Brant RF
    Can J Anaesth; 2007 Feb; 54(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 17272248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
    Yin G; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Confidence intervals].
    Stulz N
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 2011 May; 61(5):241. PubMed ID: 21567340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post hoc power calculations.
    Wallace DK; Melia M
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Nov; 115(11):2098; author reply 2098-9. PubMed ID: 19068383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeated confidence intervals for adaptive group sequential trials.
    Mehta CR; Bauer P; Posch M; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5422-33. PubMed ID: 17918195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of tolerance limits and sample size determination for clinical trials with dichotomous outcomes.
    Zaslavsky BG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):481-91. PubMed ID: 17479395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods.
    Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.
    Schaarschmidt F; Biesheuvel E; Hothorn LA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):292-310. PubMed ID: 19212881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Roaming through methodology. XXIX. P].
    Abràmoff MD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Mar; 145(12):602. PubMed ID: 11294003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.