These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21154896)

  • 1. Basic ideas and concepts for multiple comparison procedures.
    Takeuchi K
    Biom J; 2010 Dec; 52(6):722-34. PubMed ID: 21154896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constructing multiple test procedures for partially ordered hypothesis sets.
    Edwards D; Madsen J
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5116-24. PubMed ID: 17476650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compatible simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the Holm procedure and other Bonferroni-based closed tests.
    Strassburger K; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4914-27. PubMed ID: 18618415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative confidence regions for bonferroni-based closed-testing procedures that are not alpha-exhaustive.
    Guilbaud O
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):721-35. PubMed ID: 19655313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. General solutions to consistency problems in multiple hypothesis testing.
    Zhao H; Wang B; Cui X
    Biom J; 2010 Dec; 52(6):735-46. PubMed ID: 20665776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlated C-C and C-O bond conformations in saccharide hydroxymethyl groups: parametrization and application of redundant 1H-1H, 13C-1H, and 13C-13C NMR J-couplings.
    Thibaudeau C; Stenutz R; Hertz B; Klepach T; Zhao S; Wu Q; Carmichael I; Serianni AS
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec; 126(48):15668-85. PubMed ID: 15571389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous confidence regions corresponding to Holm's step-down procedure and other closed-testing procedures.
    Guilbaud O
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):678-92. PubMed ID: 18932131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Monte Carlo approach for change-point detection in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Liu M; Lu W; Shao Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3894-909. PubMed ID: 18254131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures.
    Bretz F; Maurer W; Brannath W; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):586-604. PubMed ID: 19051220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three p-value consistent procedures for multiple comparisons with a control in direction-mixed families.
    Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Holland B; Wang Y
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4253-72. PubMed ID: 17342699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical Bayes and resampling based multiple testing procedure controlling tail probability of the proportion of false positives.
    van der Laan MJ; Birkner MD; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article29. PubMed ID: 16646847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cluster formation as a measure of interpretability in multiple testing.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):852-60. PubMed ID: 18932143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.
    Friston KJ; Holmes A; Poline JB; Price CJ; Frith CD
    Neuroimage; 1996 Dec; 4(3 Pt 1):223-35. PubMed ID: 9345513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A generalized Sidak-Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence.
    Guo W; Romano J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article3. PubMed ID: 17402918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting the best treatment in designed experiments.
    Polansky AM
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(22):3461-71. PubMed ID: 14601013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A reversible minimum-to-minimum mapping method for the calculation of free-energy differences.
    Theodorou DN
    J Chem Phys; 2006 Jan; 124(3):034109. PubMed ID: 16438569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tutorial on evaluation of type I and type II errors in chemical analyses: from the analytical detection to authentication of products and process control.
    Ortiz MC; Sarabia LA; Sánchez MS
    Anal Chim Acta; 2010 Aug; 674(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 20678623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards.
    Gillen DL; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16011703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of type I error probability from experimental Dixon's "Q" parameter on testing for outliers within small size data sets.
    Efstathiou CE
    Talanta; 2006 Jul; 69(5):1068-71. PubMed ID: 18970683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.