These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21155449)

  • 1. Breast imaging pioneer sheds light on screening technology.
    Conant E
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2010 Oct; 24(11):1007. PubMed ID: 21155449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening, imaging, and image-guided biopsy techniques for breast cancer.
    Smetherman DH
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Apr; 93(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 23464688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current breast imaging modalities, advances, and impact on breast care.
    Garcia EM; Storm ES; Atkinson L; Kenny E; Mitchell LS
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2013 Sep; 40(3):429-57. PubMed ID: 24021251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer screening: why, when, and how many?
    Gemignani ML
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21278511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening: clinical, radiologic, and biochemical.
    Feldman ED; Oppong BA; Willey SC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 55(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 22828098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast Cancer Screening.
    Euhus D; Di Carlo PA; Khouri NF
    Surg Clin North Am; 2015 Oct; 95(5):991-1011. PubMed ID: 26315519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer screening in women: An integrative literature review.
    Ravert PK; Huffaker C
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 Dec; 22(12):668-73. PubMed ID: 21129075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
    Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Screening for breast cancer: worries about its effectiveness].
    Autier P
    Rev Prat; 2013 Dec; 63(10):1369-77. PubMed ID: 24579331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital mammography screening: weighing reduced mortality against increased overdiagnosis.
    de Gelder R; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten G; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ; Draisma G; de Koning HJ
    Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):134-40. PubMed ID: 21718717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Difficulties and errors in diagnosis of breast neoplasms.
    Giess CS; Frost EP; Birdwell RL
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2012 Aug; 33(4):288-99. PubMed ID: 22824119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective study of the efficacy of breast magnetic resonance imaging and mammographic screening in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Ng AK; Garber JE; Diller LR; Birdwell RL; Feng Y; Neuberg DS; Silver B; Fisher DC; Marcus KJ; Mauch PM
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 31(18):2282-8. PubMed ID: 23610104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening.
    Mainiero MB; Lourenco A; Mahoney MC; Newell MS; Bailey L; Barke LD; D'Orsi C; Harvey JA; Hayes MK; Huynh PT; Jokich PM; Lee SJ; Lehman CD; Mankoff DA; Nepute JA; Patel SB; Reynolds HE; Sutherland ML; Haffty BG
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 23290667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some may benefit from combined mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Printz C
    Cancer; 2010 Sep; 116(17):3985. PubMed ID: 20803731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of screening with annual magnetic resonance imaging and mammography: results of the initial screen from the ontario high risk breast screening program.
    Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Horgan M; Carroll JC; Eisen A; Meschino WS; Shumak RS; Warner E; Rabeneck L
    J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jul; 32(21):2224-30. PubMed ID: 24934793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controversies regarding mammography, breast self-examination, and clinical breast examination.
    Nelson AL
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2013 Sep; 40(3):413-27. PubMed ID: 24021250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial Intelligence Improves Breast Cancer Screening in Study.
    Abbasi J
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(6):499. PubMed ID: 32044919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns of nonmasslike enhancement at screening breast MR imaging of high-risk premenopausal women.
    Giess CS; Raza S; Birdwell RL
    Radiographics; 2013; 33(5):1343-60. PubMed ID: 24025928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening MR imaging versus screening ultrasound: pros and cons.
    Mahoney MC; Newell MS
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Aug; 21(3):495-508. PubMed ID: 23928240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.