These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21155550)

  • 21. Evaluation of binary QSAR models derived from LUDI and MOE scoring functions for structure based virtual screening.
    Prathipati P; Saxena AK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 16426038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. LigMatch: a multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening.
    Kinnings SL; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2056-66. PubMed ID: 19685924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. FieldChopper, a new tool for automatic model generation and virtual screening based on molecular fields.
    Kalliokoski T; Ronkko T; Poso A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18489083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Novel 2D fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Ewing T; Baber JC; Feher M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2423-31. PubMed ID: 17125184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. REPROVIS-DB: a benchmark system for ligand-based virtual screening derived from reproducible prospective applications.
    Ripphausen P; Wassermann AM; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2467-73. PubMed ID: 21902278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rapid shape-based ligand alignment and virtual screening method based on atom/feature-pair similarities and volume overlap scoring.
    Sastry GM; Dixon SL; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21870862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unconventional 2D shape similarity method affords comparable enrichment as a 3D shape method in virtual screening experiments.
    Ebalunode JO; Zheng W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 19480404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ligand expansion in ligand-based virtual screening using relevance feedback.
    Abdo A; Saeed F; Hamza H; Ahmed A; Salim N
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Mar; 26(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 22249773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting antitrichomonal activity: a computational screening using atom-based bilinear indices and experimental proofs.
    Marrero-Ponce Y; Meneses-Marcel A; Castillo-Garit JA; Machado-Tugores Y; Escario JA; Barrio AG; Pereira DM; Nogal-Ruiz JJ; Arán VJ; Martínez-Fernández AR; Torrens F; Rotondo R; Ibarra-Velarde F; Alvarado YJ
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 14(19):6502-24. PubMed ID: 16875830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of ligand-based tautomer and protomer prediction on structure-based virtual screening.
    Kalliokoski T; Salo HS; Lahtela-Kakkonen M; Poso A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2742-8. PubMed ID: 19928753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. FieldScreen: virtual screening using molecular fields. Application to the DUD data set.
    Cheeseright TJ; Mackey MD; Melville JL; Vinter JG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2108-17. PubMed ID: 18991371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Virtual fragment screening: discovery of histamine H3 receptor ligands using ligand-based and protein-based molecular fingerprints.
    Sirci F; Istyastono EP; Vischer HF; Kooistra AJ; Nijmeijer S; Kuijer M; Wijtmans M; Mannhold R; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3308-24. PubMed ID: 23140085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Current trends in ligand-based virtual screening: molecular representations, data mining methods, new application areas, and performance evaluation.
    Geppert H; Vogt M; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Feb; 50(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 20088575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Virtual screening for R-groups, including predicted pIC50 contributions, within large structural databases, using Topomer CoMFA.
    Cramer RD; Cruz P; Stahl G; Curtiss WC; Campbell B; Masek BB; Soltanshahi F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2180-95. PubMed ID: 18956863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis and comparison of 2D fingerprints: insights into database screening performance using eight fingerprint methods.
    Duan J; Dixon SL; Lowrie JF; Sherman W
    J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Sep; 29(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 20579912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Introduction of the conditional correlated Bernoulli model of similarity value distributions and its application to the prospective prediction of fingerprint search performance.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2496-506. PubMed ID: 21892818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improving classical substructure-based virtual screening to handle extrapolation challenges.
    Biniashvili T; Schreiber E; Kliger Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):678-85. PubMed ID: 22360790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How to benchmark methods for structure-based virtual screening of large compound libraries.
    Christofferson AJ; Huang N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():187-95. PubMed ID: 22183538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Novel technologies for virtual screening.
    Lengauer T; Lemmen C; Rarey M; Zimmermann M
    Drug Discov Today; 2004 Jan; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 14761803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.