These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21155799)

  • 1. The CSI effect and the Canadian and the Australian Jury.
    Holmgren JA; Fordham J
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S63-71. PubMed ID: 21155799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examination of the "CSI Effect" on Perceptions of Scientific and Testimonial Evidence in a Hong Kong Chinese Sample.
    Hui CY; Lo TW
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2017 May; 61(7):819-833. PubMed ID: 26486422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.
    Hans VP; Kaye DH; Dann BM; Farley EJ; Albertson S
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20461543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility.
    McCarthy Wilcox A; NicDaeid N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():100-108. PubMed ID: 30216840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will the law come running? The potential role of "brain fingerprinting" in crime investigation and adjudication in Australia.
    Dickson K; McMahon M
    J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):204-22. PubMed ID: 16304761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The CSI effect in Forensic Odontology. A systematic review.
    Christoloukas N; Mitsea A
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2022 Aug; 40(2):38-43. PubMed ID: 36027897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The CSI effect and its impact on the perceptions of forensic science experts' work].
    Stojer J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 22715679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding juror perceptions of forensic evidence: investigating the impact of case context on perceptions of forensic evidence strength.
    Smith LL; Bull R; Holliday R
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):409-14. PubMed ID: 21210812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence.
    Thompson WC; Scurich N
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 30791101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination.
    Crozier WE; Kukucka J; Garrett BL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110433. PubMed ID: 32763747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI; Watkins I; Sayle MA; Newell BR
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Jun; 37(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 23750600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conduct and its consequences: attempts at debiasing jury judgments.
    Smith AC; Greene E
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):505-26. PubMed ID: 16254740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expert testimony on eyewitness evidence: in search of common sense.
    Houston KA; Hope L; Memon A; Don Read J
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):637-51. PubMed ID: 24000168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Juror and expert knowledge of child sexual abuse.
    Morison S; Greene E
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(4):595-613. PubMed ID: 1393722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The CSI effect on cold case investigations.
    Trainum JL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():455-460. PubMed ID: 31138462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating CSI: portrayals of DNA testing on a forensic crime show and their potential effects.
    Ley BL; Jankowski N; Brewer PR
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 22530487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
    Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An examination of the "CSI effect"--relevance for expert witnesses in the aerospace community.
    Soper J
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1000. PubMed ID: 18856193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.