These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21156867)
21. The representation and integration in memory of spatial and nonspatial information. McNamara TP; Halpin JA; Hardy JK Mem Cognit; 1992 Sep; 20(5):519-32. PubMed ID: 1453969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The mental wormhole: internal attention shifts without regard for distance. Tanoue RT; Berryhill ME Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1199-215. PubMed ID: 22549808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Enumerating by pointing to locations: a new method for measuring the numerosity of visual object representations. Haladjian HH; Pylyshyn ZW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 21264734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Acquisition and transfer of spatial knowledge during wayfinding. He Q; McNamara TP; Bodenheimer B; Klippel A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1364-1386. PubMed ID: 30124310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Map in Our Head Is Not Oriented North: Evidence from a Real-World Environment. Brunyé TT; Burte H; Houck LA; Taylor HA PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0135803. PubMed ID: 26353119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accessibility versus accuracy in retrieving spatial memory: evidence for suboptimal assumed headings. Yerramsetti A; Marchette SA; Shelton AL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1106-14. PubMed ID: 23206169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Geographical slant facilitates navigation and orientation in virtual environments. Restat JD; Steck SD; Mochnatzki HF; Mallot HA Perception; 2004; 33(6):667-87. PubMed ID: 15330364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Paying attention to working memory: Similarities in the spatial distribution of attention in mental and physical space. Sahan MI; Verguts T; Boehler CN; Pourtois G; Fias W Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26704925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space. Neggers SF; Van der Lubbe RH; Ramsey NF; Postma A Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):320-31. PubMed ID: 16473025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations. Sturz BR; Kelly DM; Brown MF Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19777275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes. Garsoffky B; Schwan S; Hesse FW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1035-50. PubMed ID: 12450330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Properties of cognitive maps constructed from texts. Ferguson EL; Hegarty M Mem Cognit; 1994 Jul; 22(4):455-73. PubMed ID: 7934950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reference frames in learning from maps and navigation. Meilinger T; Frankenstein J; Watanabe K; Bülthoff HH; Hölscher C Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):1000-8. PubMed ID: 25416007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment. Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Kosslyn SM; Koenig O; Barrett A; Cave CB; Tang J; Gabrieli JD J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):723-35. PubMed ID: 2531207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]