These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21156872)

  • 1. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Tang DT
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1087-100. PubMed ID: 21156872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do forewarnings and post-warnings affect misinformation reliance? The impact of warnings on the continued influence effect and belief regression.
    Buczel KA; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38261249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Swire B; Chang D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):570-8. PubMed ID: 21359617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect.
    Buczel KA; Szyszka PD; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267463. PubMed ID: 35482715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Fenton O; Martin K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):292-304. PubMed ID: 24005789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the role of information integration in the continued influence effect using an event segmentation approach.
    Sanderson JA; Farrell S; Ecker UKH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271566. PubMed ID: 35849610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued influence of misinformation.
    Xu Y; Wong R; He S; Veldre A; Andrews S
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1112-1127. PubMed ID: 32430888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
    Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.
    Karanian JM; Rabb N; Wulff AN; Torrance MG; Thomas AK; Race E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(37):22771-22779. PubMed ID: 32868423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experiencing misinformation: The effect of pre-exposure warnings and debunking on psychic beliefs.
    Kuhn G; Ortega J; Simmons K; Thomas C; Mohr C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; 76(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 35848541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: plausibility effects on memory for misinformation.
    Hinze SR; Slaten DG; Horton WS; Jenkins R; Rapp DN
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):305-24. PubMed ID: 24005790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Terrorists brought down the plane!--No, actually it was a technical fault: processing corrections of emotive information.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Apai J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):283-310. PubMed ID: 20694936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing reliance on inaccurate information.
    Rapp DN; Hinze SR; Kohlhepp K; Ryskin RA
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 23761183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?
    Connor Desai S; Reimers S
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):422-436. PubMed ID: 36125658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rational continued influence of misinformation.
    Connor Desai SA; Pilditch TD; Madsen JK
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104453. PubMed ID: 33011527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions.
    Westbrook V; Wegener DT; Susmann MW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 36988856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation.
    Susmann MW; Wegener DT
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Feb; 50(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 34533754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing Warnings on E-Cigarette Advertisements.
    King JL; Lazard A; Reboussin BA; Ranney L; Cornacchione Ross J; Wagoner KG; Sutfin EL
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2020 Apr; 22(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 31132095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure to accept retractions: A contribution to the continued influence effect.
    O'Rear AE; Radvansky GA
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):127-144. PubMed ID: 31317393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.