These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21156872)

  • 21. Deception and the misinformation effect: an event-related potential study.
    Meek SW; Phillips MC; Boswell CP; Vendemia JM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jan; 87(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23183315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of warning habits and beliefs across the adult life span.
    Hancock HE; Rogers WA; Fisk AD
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 11866191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning errors from fiction: difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories.
    Marsh EJ; Fazio LK
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1140-9. PubMed ID: 17128612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploring the neural substrates of misinformation processing.
    Gordon A; Brooks JCW; Quadflieg S; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():216-224. PubMed ID: 28987910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Chang EP; Pillai R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Dec; 20(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 25347407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect.
    Ecker UKH; Antonio LM
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):631-644. PubMed ID: 33452666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When a lie becomes the truth: the effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory.
    Pickel KL
    Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 15098618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation.
    Kan IP; Pizzonia KL; Drummey AB; Mikkelsen EJV
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Nov; 6(1):76. PubMed ID: 34837587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Memory blindness: Altered memory reports lead to distortion in eyewitness memory.
    Cochran KJ; Greenspan RL; Bogart DF; Loftus EF
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):717-26. PubMed ID: 26884087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies.
    Zaragoza MS; Koshmider JW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 2522514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unveiling the truth: warnings reduce the repetition-based truth effect.
    Nadarevic L; Aßfalg A
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jul; 81(4):814-826. PubMed ID: 27318939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events.
    Memon A; Zaragoza M; Clifford BR; Kidd L
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Apr; 34(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 19301110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on recollection: the case of vaccine misinformation.
    Pluviano S; Della Sala S; Watt C
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 32333126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Proactive and retroactive effects of negative suggestion.
    Brown AS; Brown CM; Mosbacher JL; Dryden WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1234-43. PubMed ID: 17087580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics.
    Echterhoff G; Hirst W; Hussy W
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):770-82. PubMed ID: 16383166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When lying changes memory for the truth.
    Otgaar H; Baker A
    Memory; 2018 Jan; 26(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 28661223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Repetition, not number of sources, increases both susceptibility to misinformation and confidence in the accuracy of eyewitnesses.
    Foster JL; Huthwaite T; Yesberg JA; Garry M; Loftus EF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 22257711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How prior testing impacts misinformation processing: A dual-task approach.
    Gordon LT; Bilolikar VK; Hodhod T; Thomas AK
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):314-324. PubMed ID: 31385240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Misinformation can influence memory for recently experienced, highly stressful events.
    Morgan CA; Southwick S; Steffian G; Hazlett GA; Loftus EF
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 23219699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics.
    Farrow TF; Hopwood MC; Parks RW; Hunter MD; Spence SA
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 21291161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.