BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21157234)

  • 1. Hospital computerized provider order entry adoption and quality: An examination of the United States.
    Swanson Kazley A; Diana ML
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2011; 36(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 21157234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting computerized physician order entry system adoption in US hospitals: can the federal mandate be met?
    Ford EW; McAlearney AS; Phillips MT; Menachemi N; Rudolph B
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Aug; 77(8):539-45. PubMed ID: 18053762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of health system membership on patient safety initiatives.
    Ford EW; Short JC
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2008; 33(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 18091440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals.
    McCullough JS; Casey M; Moscovice I; Prasad S
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Apr; 29(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 20368594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems.
    Cutler DM; Feldman NE; Horwitz JR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(6):1654-63. PubMed ID: 16284040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospital quality of care: does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care.
    Menachemi N; Chukmaitov A; Saunders C; Brooks RG
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2008; 33(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 18091444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early adopters of computerized physician order entry in hospitals that care for children: a picture of US health care shortly after the Institute of Medicine reports on quality.
    Teufel RJ; Kazley AS; Basco WT
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2009 May; 48(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 19224864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospital implementation of computerized provider order entry systems: results from the 2003 leapfrog group quality and safety survey.
    Hillman JM; Given RS
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2005; 19(4):55-65. PubMed ID: 16266033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meaningful use of computerized prescriber order entry.
    Classen D; Bates DW; Denham CR
    J Patient Saf; 2010 Mar; 6(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 22130298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of multihospital system membership in electronic medical record adoption.
    Li P; Bahensky JA; Jaana M; Ward MM
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2008; 33(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 18360167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized provider order entry system field research: the impact of contextual factors on study implementation.
    Snyder R; Weston MJ; Fields W; Rizos A; Tedeschi C
    Int J Med Inform; 2006; 75(10-11):730-40. PubMed ID: 16326134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of a computerized physician order-entry system.
    Stone WM; Smith BE; Shaft JD; Nelson RD; Money SR
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 May; 208(5):960-7; discussion 967-9. PubMed ID: 19476871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized physician order entry in the critical care environment: a review of current literature.
    Maslove DM; Rizk N; Lowe HJ
    J Intensive Care Med; 2011; 26(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 21257633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decrease in hospital-wide mortality rate after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system.
    Longhurst CA; Parast L; Sandborg CI; Widen E; Sullivan J; Hahn JS; Dawes CG; Sharek PJ
    Pediatrics; 2010 Jul; 126(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 20439590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More moving to entry level. CPOE adoption slowly gains ground, with larger number expecting installations.
    Conn J
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(9):41-2, 44. PubMed ID: 17348387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence.
    Jha AK; Ferris TG; Donelan K; DesRoches C; Shields A; Rosenbaum S; Blumenthal D
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w496-507. PubMed ID: 17035341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increasing adoption of computerized provider order entry, and persistent regional disparities, in US emergency departments.
    Pallin DJ; Sullivan AF; Espinola JA; Landman AB; Camargo CA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Dec; 58(6):543-550.e3. PubMed ID: 21802779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of U.S.A. acute care hospitals' computer-based provider order entry system infusion levels.
    Sittig DF; Guappone K; Campbell EM; Dykstra RH; Ash JS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):252-6. PubMed ID: 17911717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation and certification of computerized provider order entry systems.
    Classen DC; Avery AJ; Bates DW
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 17077453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does computerised provider order entry reduce test turnaround times? A before-and-after study at four hospitals.
    Westbrook JI; Georgiou A; Lam M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():527-31. PubMed ID: 19745367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.