BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21158266)

  • 1. Court 'capped' verdict for $2.2 million at $300,000. Chastain v. AnMed Health Foundation, 694 S.E.2d 541(6/16/2010)-SC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Nov; 51(6):4. PubMed ID: 21158266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. State Supreme Court ordered new trial after verdict for $5.1 million. Bedell v. Williams, 2012 Ark. 75-664 (2/23/2012)_S.W. 3.d _-AR.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Jul; 53(2):1. PubMed ID: 22919776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurses failed to check Dr.'s order: $2.3 million verdict. Case on point: Lovell v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center, 409-2409 (1/12/2010)-IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Feb; 50(9):2. PubMed ID: 20232663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stomach stapling botched: $4 million verdict upheld.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jun; 47(1):2. PubMed ID: 16892960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of decubitus ulcers botched: verdict for $3,050,000.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jun; 49(1):1. PubMed ID: 18686887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi $ award cut: case remanded for new trial. Bedell v. Williams, 2012 Ark. 75, 11-664 S.W. 3d (2/23/2012)-AR.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 May; 52(12):1. PubMed ID: 22679662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical malpractice. Punitive damages allowed in the absence of compensatory damages in Alabama. Mobile Infirmary Medical Center v. Hodgen, So 3d, No. 1011932 (Ala. October 31, 2003).
    West JC
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2004; 24(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 16383267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tort law - loss of a chance doctrine - Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court accepts loss of a chance in medical malpractice suits. - Matsuyama v. Birnbaum, 890 N.E.2d 819 (Mass. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 Feb; 122(4):1247-54. PubMed ID: 19320069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. $200 + million verdict: it started with a midlevel's mistake.
    Crane M
    Med Econ; 2007 Dec; 84(23):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 18260545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Could a malpractice mega-verdict wipe you out?
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 2003 May; 80(10):89-91. PubMed ID: 12828031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court Decisions on Medical Malpractice in China After the New Tort Liability Law.
    Zhang K; Li Y; Fan F; Liu X; Deng ZH
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2016 Sep; 37(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 27281443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LA: Judgment for defendants reversed: fact issues for jury precluded summary action. Gleason v. Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, 031010 LACA2,44,947-CA (3/19/2010)-LA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):3. PubMed ID: 20503498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jury verdict of $6.875 million in punitive damages for wrongful death affirmed by Alabama Supreme Court. Atkins v. Lee.
    Hirsh BD
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 1995; 6(1):11, 15-6. PubMed ID: 10184294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Florida's birth-related injury 'plan' no bar to suit.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Jul; 50(2):4. PubMed ID: 20302151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The verdict is in--post trial.
    Dupont PR; Nigro M
    Mo Med; 2006; 103(6):588-92. PubMed ID: 17256264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limiting damages for "pain and suffering" in medical malpractice.
    Sloan FA
    N C Med J; 2003; 64(4):191-4. PubMed ID: 12971246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Georgia Supreme Court affirmed 'gross negligence' standard Case on point: Gliemmo v. Cousineau, SO9A1807 (3/15/2010) So.2d-GA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):4. PubMed ID: 20499621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Error in mitral valve surgery: court reversed $7 million verdict. Case on point: the Methodist Hospital v. German, 01-09-00925-CV (12/29/2011)-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Jan; 52(8):2. PubMed ID: 23097901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Resolving the legal status in a doubtful case before the court].
    Gamm S
    Pflege Z; 2012 Sep; 65(9):562-4. PubMed ID: 22994129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why wasn't 'continuous treatment' doctrine applied? Case on point: Knox v. Greenville Hospital System, 2005 WL 20007 S.E.2d--SC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jan; 45(8):2. PubMed ID: 15754900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.