167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21158279)
21. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative study of layered and volumetric rescanning for different scanning speeds of proton beam in liver patients.
Bernatowicz K; Lomax AJ; Knopf A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):7905-20. PubMed ID: 24165090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development and long-term stability of a comprehensive daily QA program for a modern pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy delivery system.
Rana S; Bennouna J; Samuel EJJ; Gutierrez AN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):29-44. PubMed ID: 30920146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Patient handling system for carbon ion beam scanning therapy.
Mori S; Shirai T; Takei Y; Furukawa T; Inaniwa T; Matsuzaki Y; Kumagai M; Murakami T; Noda K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 13(6):3926. PubMed ID: 23149784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimization of beam parameters and treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Trofimov A; Bortfeld T
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Oct; 2(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 14529308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robustness of target dose coverage to motion uncertainties for scanned carbon ion beam tracking therapy of moving tumors.
Eley JG; Newhauser WD; Richter D; Lüchtenborg R; Saito N; Bert C
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(4):1717-40. PubMed ID: 25650520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Experimental verification of a non-invasive method to monitor the lateral pencil beam position in an anthropomorphic phantom for carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Félix-Bautista R; Gehrke T; Ghesquière-Diérickx L; Reimold M; Amato C; Turecek D; Jakubek J; Ellerbrock M; Martišíková M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 64(17):175019. PubMed ID: 31239428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implementation of a triple Gaussian beam model with subdivision and redefinition against density heterogeneities in treatment planning for scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Inaniwa T; Kanematsu N; Hara Y; Furukawa T; Fukahori M; Nakao M; Shirai T
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(18):5361-86. PubMed ID: 25157579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dosimetric effect of the low dose envelope associated with different beam models for carbon-ion spot scanning beam delivery.
Zhang H; Dai T; Liu X; Chen W; Ma Y; He P; Shen G; Yuan P; Dai Z; Li Q
Acta Oncol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):1790-1793. PubMed ID: 31368396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Variations in proton scanned beam dose delivery due to uncertainties in magnetic beam steering.
Peterson S; Polf J; Ciangaru G; Frank SJ; Bues M; Smith A
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3693-702. PubMed ID: 19746802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy: clinical implementation and application.
Jäkel O; Krämer M; Karger CP; Debus J
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1101-16. PubMed ID: 11324954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dose painting and theragnostic imaging: towards the prescription, planning and delivery of biologically targeted dose distributions in external beam radiation oncology.
Bentzen SM
Cancer Treat Res; 2008; 139():41-62. PubMed ID: 18236711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Particle therapy of moving targets-the strategies for tumour motion monitoring and moving targets irradiation.
Kubiak T
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20150275. PubMed ID: 27376637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam.
Whitaker TJ; Beltran C; Tryggestad E; Bues M; Kruse JJ; Remmes NB; Tasson A; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081703. PubMed ID: 25086513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Treatment planning for scanned ion beams.
Krämer M; Jäkel O; Haberer T; Rietzel E; Schardt D; Scholz M; Wang JF; Weber U; Weyrather W
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Dec; 73 Suppl 2():S80-5. PubMed ID: 15971316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Conformity and robustness of gated rescanned carbon ion pencil beam scanning of liver tumors at NIRS.
Mori S; Zenklusen S; Inaniwa T; Furukawa T; Imada H; Shirai T; Noda K; Yasuda S
Radiother Oncol; 2014 Jun; 111(3):431-6. PubMed ID: 24785510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Carbon-Ion Pencil Beam Scanning Treatment With Gated Markerless Tumor Tracking: An Analysis of Positional Accuracy.
Mori S; Karube M; Shirai T; Tajiri M; Takekoshi T; Miki K; Shiraishi Y; Tanimoto K; Shibayama K; Yasuda S; Yamamoto N; Yamada S; Tsuji H; Noda K; Kamada T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):258-266. PubMed ID: 26960747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of a new concept automatic frequency controller for an ultrasmall C-band linear accelerator guide.
Kamino Y; Tsukuda K; Kokubo M; Miura S; Hirai E; Hiraoka M; Ishikawa J
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3243-8. PubMed ID: 17879787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest.
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):880-914. PubMed ID: 11704310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modulated beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors.
Boyer AL; Geis P; Grant W; Carol M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Aug; 39(1):227-36. PubMed ID: 9300758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
