575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21158280)
1. Oblique incidence for broad monoenergetic proton beams.
Jette D; Yuan J; Chen W
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5683-90. PubMed ID: 21158280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A fourier analysis on the maximum acceptable grid size for discrete proton beam dose calculation.
Li HS; Romeijn HE; Dempsey JF
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3508-18. PubMed ID: 17022247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benchmarking analytical calculations of proton doses in heterogeneous matter.
Ciangaru G; Polf JC; Bues M; Smith AR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3511-23. PubMed ID: 16475750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental verification of dose calculation using the simplified Monte Carlo method with an improved initial beam model for a beam-wobbling system.
Tansho R; Takada Y; Kohno R; Hotta K; Hara Y; Mizutani S; Akimoto T
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(17):6047-64. PubMed ID: 23939011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A proton dose calculation algorithm for conformal therapy simulations based on Molière's theory of lateral deflections.
Deasy JO
Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):476-83. PubMed ID: 9571613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extension of a numerical algorithm to proton dose calculations. I. Comparisons with Monte Carlo simulations.
Sandison GA; Lee CC; Lu X; Papiez LS
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):841-9. PubMed ID: 9198017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proton loss model for therapeutic beam dose calculations.
Sandison GA; Chvetsov AV
Med Phys; 2000 Sep; 27(9):2133-45. PubMed ID: 11011743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Very high-energy electron dose calculation using the Fermi-Eyges theory of multiple scattering and a simplified pencil beam model.
Ronga MG; Deut U; Bonfrate A; De Marzi L
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):8009-8022. PubMed ID: 37730956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A beam source model for scanned proton beams.
Kimstrand P; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A; Grusell E; Glimelius B; Tilly N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3151-68. PubMed ID: 17505095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial beam size study for passive scatter proton therapy. II. Changes in delivered depth dose profiles.
Polf JC; Harvey MC; Smith AR
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4219-22. PubMed ID: 18072486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pencil beam algorithm for helium ion beam therapy.
Fuchs H; Strobele J; Schreiner T; Hirtl A; Georg D
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6726-37. PubMed ID: 23127066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo linear accelerator simulation of megavoltage photon beams: independent determination of initial beam parameters.
Almberg SS; Frengen J; Kylling A; Lindmo T
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22225273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of electron beam obliquity on lateral buildup ratio: a Monte Carlo dosimetry evaluation.
Chow JC; Grigorov GN
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3965-77. PubMed ID: 17664588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
