These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21158284)

  • 1. Exploring the potential of context-sensitive CADe in screening mammography.
    Tourassi GD; Mazurowski MA; Harrawood BP; Krupinski EA
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5728-36. PubMed ID: 21158284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing false positives of microcalcification detection systems by removal of breast arterial calcifications.
    Mordang JJ; Gubern-Mérida A; den Heeten G; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1676. PubMed ID: 27036566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinically missed cancer: how effectively can radiologists use computer-aided detection?
    Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Linver MN; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Stull MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):708-16. PubMed ID: 22358014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 1000-Case Reader Study of Radiologists' Performance in Interpretation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images with a Computer-Aided Detection System.
    Xu X; Bao L; Tan Y; Zhu L; Kong F; Wang W
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1694-1702. PubMed ID: 29853222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.
    Cole EB; Zhang Z; Marques HS; Nishikawa RM; Hendrick RE; Yaffe MJ; Padungchaichote W; Kuzmiak C; Chayakulkheeree J; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Baum J; Gatsonis C; Pisano E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):W392-401. PubMed ID: 22915432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving computer-aided detection assistance in breast cancer screening by removal of obviously false-positive findings.
    Mordang JJ; Gubern-Mérida A; Bria A; Tortorella F; den Heeten G; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1390-1401. PubMed ID: 28182277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the link between radiologists' gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content.
    Tourassi G; Voisin S; Paquit V; Krupinski E
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 23788627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Probabilistic Model to Support Radiologists' Classification Decisions in Mammography Practice.
    Zeng J; Gimenez F; Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Shachter R
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Apr; 39(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30819048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Bailey JE; Nees AV; Blane CE; Adler DD; Patterson SK; Klein KA; Pinsky RW; Helvie MA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):810-8. PubMed ID: 19375953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support.
    Samulski M; Hupse R; Boetes C; Mus RD; den Heeten GJ; Karssemeijer N
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Oct; 20(10):2323-30. PubMed ID: 20532890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.
    Elmore JG; Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Buist DS
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 19864507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A signal-detection experiment measuring the effect of computer-aided detection on radiologists' performance.
    Ikeda M; Shigaki T; Yamauchi K
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 10929857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting diagnostic error in radiology via eye-tracking and image analytics: preliminary investigation in mammography.
    Voisin S; Pinto F; Morin-Ducote G; Hudson KB; Tourassi GD
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101906. PubMed ID: 24089908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can a Machine Learn from Radiologists' Visual Search Behaviour and Their Interpretation of Mammograms-a Deep-Learning Study.
    Mall S; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Oct; 32(5):746-760. PubMed ID: 31410677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.
    Kim SH; Lee EH; Jun JK; Kim YM; Chang YW; Lee JH; Kim HW; Choi EJ;
    Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30672161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fixated and Not Fixated Regions of Mammograms: A Higher-Order Statistical Analysis of Visual Search Behavior.
    Mall S; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 28139426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. JOURNAL CLUB: Computer-Aided Detection of Lung Nodules on CT With a Computerized Pulmonary Vessel Suppressed Function.
    Lo SB; Freedman MT; Gillis LB; White CS; Mun SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):480-488. PubMed ID: 29336601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening in Mammography (AI-STREAM): A Prospective Multicenter Study Design in Korea Using AI-Based CADe/x.
    Chang YW; An JK; Choi N; Ko KH; Kim KH; Han K; Ryu JK
    J Breast Cancer; 2022 Feb; 25(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 35133093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of radiologist experience on the risk of false-positive results in breast cancer screening programs.
    Alberdi RZ; Llanes AB; Ortega RA; Expósito RR; Collado JM; Verdes TQ; Ramos CN; Sanz ME; Trejo DS; Oliveres XC;
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Oct; 21(10):2083-90. PubMed ID: 21643887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.