BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21158287)

  • 1. A neural network based 3D/3D image registration quality evaluator for the head-and-neck patient setup in the absence of a ground truth.
    Wu J; Murphy MJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5756-64. PubMed ID: 21158287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A neural network-based 2D/3D image registration quality evaluator for pediatric patient setup in external beam radiotherapy.
    Wu J; Su Z; Li Z
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 26894329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. WE-E-213CD-10: A Robust 2D/3D Image Registration System for Pediatric Patient Setup in External Beam Radiotherapy.
    Wu J; Su Z; Li Z
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part27):3961. PubMed ID: 28520024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel image registration quality evaluator (RQE) with an implementation for automated patient positioning in cranial radiation therapy.
    Wu J; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2099-112. PubMed ID: 17654913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the intrinsic precision of 3D/3D rigid image registration results for patient setup in the absence of a ground truth.
    Wu J; Murphy MJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2501-8. PubMed ID: 20632561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A neural network approach for fast, automated quantification of DIR performance.
    Neylon J; Min Y; Low DA; Santhanam A
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4126-4138. PubMed ID: 28477340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate positioning for head and neck cancer patients using 2D and 3D image guidance.
    Kang H; Lovelock DM; Yorke ED; Kriminski S; Lee N; Amols HI
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 12(1):3270. PubMed ID: 21330971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of low-dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT.
    Cassetta R; Piersimoni P; Riboldi M; Giacometti V; Bashkirov V; Baroni G; Ordonez C; Coutrakon G; Schulte R
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):83-90. PubMed ID: 30933433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
    Zheng G
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
    Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demons deformable registration for CBCT-guided procedures in the head and neck: convergence and accuracy.
    Nithiananthan S; Brock KK; Daly MJ; Chan H; Irish JC; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4755-64. PubMed ID: 19928106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of surface registration compared to conventional volumetric registration in patient positioning for head-and-neck radiotherapy: a simulation study using patient data.
    Kim Y; Li R; Na YH; Lee R; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121701. PubMed ID: 25471948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D surface imaging system for patient setup in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
    Gopan O; Wu Q
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):547-52. PubMed ID: 22365627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiatlas approach with local registration goodness weighting for MRI-based electron density mapping of head and neck anatomy.
    Farjam R; Tyagi N; Veeraraghavan H; Apte A; Zakian K; Hunt MA; Deasy JO
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3706-3717. PubMed ID: 28444772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new markerless patient-to-image registration method using a portable 3D scanner.
    Fan Y; Jiang D; Wang M; Song Z
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101910. PubMed ID: 25281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fully automatic multi-organ segmentation for head and neck cancer radiotherapy using shape representation model constrained fully convolutional neural networks.
    Tong N; Gou S; Yang S; Ruan D; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4558-4567. PubMed ID: 30136285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An automated, quantitative, and case-specific evaluation of deformable image registration in computed tomography images.
    Kierkels RGJ; den Otter LA; Korevaar EW; Langendijk JA; van der Schaaf A; Knopf AC; Sijtsema NM
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045026. PubMed ID: 29182154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intensity-based 2D-3D spine image registration incorporating a single fiducial marker.
    Russakoff DB; Rohlfing T; Adler JR; Maurer CR
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 15691724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated 2D-3D registration of portal images and CT data using line-segment enhancement.
    Munbodh R; Chen Z; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Knisely JP; Duncan JS
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4352-61. PubMed ID: 18975681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.