These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21158883)

  • 1. An exploration of the initial effects of stereoscopic displays on optometric parameters.
    Fortuin MF; Lambooij MT; Ijsselsteijn WA; Heynderickx I; Edgar DF; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jan; 31(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 21158883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accommodation to multiple-focal-plane displays: Implications for improving stereoscopic displays and for accommodation control.
    MacKenzie KJ; Hoffman DM; Watt SJ
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):22. PubMed ID: 20884597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence on visual function by a stereoscopic TV programme with binocular liquid crystal shutter and Hi-Vision TV display.
    Oohira A; Ochiai M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1310-4. PubMed ID: 8888642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual mechanisms governing the perception of auto-stereograms.
    Gómez AT; Lupón N; Cardona G; Aznar-Casanova JA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Mar; 95(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 22023025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual fatigue and discomfort after stereoscopic display viewing.
    Zhang L; Zhang YQ; Zhang JS; Xu L; Jonas JB
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 91(2):e149-53. PubMed ID: 23164154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of stereoscopic picture quality with CFF.
    Mitsuhashi T
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1344-56. PubMed ID: 8974885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stereoscopic viewing and reported perceived immersion and symptoms.
    Yang SN; Schlieski T; Selmins B; Cooper SC; Doherty RA; Corriveau PJ; Sheedy JE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1068-80. PubMed ID: 22733100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decreased accommodative response in the nondominant eye of patients with intermittent exotropia.
    Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jan; 151(1):71-76.e1. PubMed ID: 20970775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of the depth order of defocused images.
    Nguyen VA; Howard IP; Allison RS
    Vision Res; 2005 Apr; 45(8):1003-11. PubMed ID: 15695185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic accommodative response to different visual stimuli (2D vs 3D) while watching television and while playing Nintendo 3DS console.
    Oliveira S; Jorge J; González-Méijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):383-9. PubMed ID: 22882150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of age and optical blur on real depth stereoacuity.
    Costa MF; Moreira SM; Hamer RD; Ventura DF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 20883352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Depth of focus and visual recognition of imagery presented on simultaneously viewed displays: implications for head-mounted displays.
    Winterbottom MD; Patterson R; Pierce BJ; Covas CM; Winner J
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):907-19. PubMed ID: 17915606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Saccades and fixations in children with delayed reading skills.
    Vinuela-Navarro V; Erichsen JT; Williams C; Woodhouse JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):531-541. PubMed ID: 28656674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Inverse stereoscopy].
    Reiner J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Jan; 206(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 7897969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual fatigue while watching 3D stimuli from different positions.
    Aznar-Casanova JA; Romeo A; Gómez AT; Enrile PM
    J Optom; 2017; 10(3):149-160. PubMed ID: 27544414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye preference within the context of binocular functions.
    Ehrenstein WH; Arnold-Schulz-Gahmen BE; Jaschinski W
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 243(9):926-32. PubMed ID: 15838666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments.
    Wann JP; Rushton S; Mon-Williams M
    Vision Res; 1995 Oct; 35(19):2731-6. PubMed ID: 7483313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binocular coordination in response to two-dimensional, three-dimensional and stereoscopic visual stimuli.
    Blythe HI; Holliman NS; Jainta S; Tbaily LW; Liversedge SP
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):397-411. PubMed ID: 22775140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.