These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21159335)
1. Measuring wrist and hand function: common scales and checklists. Hoang-Kim A; Pegreffi F; Moroni A; Ladd A Injury; 2011 Mar; 42(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 21159335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Responsiveness of three Patient Report Outcome (PRO) measures in patients with hand fractures: A preliminary cohort study. Weinstock-Zlotnick G; Page C; Ghomrawi HM; Wolff AL J Hand Ther; 2015; 28(4):403-10; quiz 411. PubMed ID: 26209162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. MacDermid JC; Tottenham V J Hand Ther; 2004; 17(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 14770134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Patient-Rated Wrist (and Hand) Evaluation (PRWE/PRWHE) measurement properties, translation, and/ or cross-cultural adaptation. Shafiee E; MacDermid J; Farzad M; Karbalaei M Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 44(22):6551-6565. PubMed ID: 34505793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross‑cultural adaptation, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (Thai PRWHE). Atthakomol P; Manosroi W; Mongkonkamthon A; Buranaworathitikul P; Wongcharoen W; Tongprasert S; Wongpakaran T Qual Life Res; 2021 Jun; 30(6):1793-1802. PubMed ID: 33506434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders. Chanthana P; Atthakomol P; Manosroi W; Wongpakaran T; Kraisarin J; Sananpanich K J Orthop Traumatol; 2023 Jan; 24(1):2. PubMed ID: 36622514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of construct validity of the Finnish versions of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Instrument and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Uimonen MM; Hulkkonen SM; Ryhänen J; Ponkilainen VT; Häkkinen AH; Karppinen J; Repo JP J Hand Ther; 2020; 33(4):571-579. PubMed ID: 31481338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Beaton DE; Katz JN; Fossel AH; Wright JG; Tarasuk V; Bombardier C J Hand Ther; 2001; 14(2):128-46. PubMed ID: 11382253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures assessing recovery from hand fractures: a systematic review. Mousoulis C; Firth AD; Marson A; Gagnier JJ Qual Life Res; 2024 Dec; 33(12):3213-3221. PubMed ID: 39215857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural validity of the Dutch version of the disability of arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV) in adult patients with hand and wrist injuries. van Eck ME; Lameijer CM; El Moumni M BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jun; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 29960600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire. Öke Topcu D; İkbali Afşar S Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Apr; 49(2):574-582. PubMed ID: 30997792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of the measurement properties of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. Mehta SP; MacDermid JC; Richardson J; MacIntyre NJ; Grewal R J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Apr; 45(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 25827124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement properties of the Dutch versions of QuickDASH and PRWHE in patients with complaints of hand, wrist, forearm and elbow. Berduszek RJ; Reneman MF; Dekker R; van der Sluis CK J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2024; 37(4):871-881. PubMed ID: 38250756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Responsiveness of the Korean version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release. Wi SM; Gong HS; Bae KJ; Roh YH; Lee YH; Baek GH Clin Orthop Surg; 2014 Jun; 6(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 24900903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose? Changulani M; Okonkwo U; Keswani T; Kalairajah Y Int Orthop; 2008 Feb; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17534619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in patients with hand injury. Horng YS; Lin MC; Feng CT; Huang CH; Wu HC; Wang JD J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 35(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 20138712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. Kotsis SV; Chung KC J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jan; 30(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 15680560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of responsiveness of Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, and Duruöz Hand Index in patients with traumatic hand injury. Dogu B; Usen A; Kuran B; Yilmaz F; Sirzai H J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2019; 32(1):111-117. PubMed ID: 30248042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and PROMIS Instruments in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Mahmood B; Chongshu C; Qiu X; Messing S; Hammert WC J Hand Surg Am; 2019 May; 44(5):366-373. PubMed ID: 30581054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]