BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21159405)

  • 1. Validated finite element models of the proximal femur using two-dimensional projected geometry and bone density.
    Op Den Buijs J; Dragomir-Daescu D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Nov; 104(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21159405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In situ parameter identification of optimal density-elastic modulus relationships in subject-specific finite element models of the proximal femur.
    Cong A; Buijs JO; Dragomir-Daescu D
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 21030287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.
    Pisharody S; Phillips R; Langton CM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 18491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of local proximal tibial subchondral bone structural stiffness using subject-specific finite element modeling: Effect of selected density-modulus relationship.
    Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Aug; 30(7):703-12. PubMed ID: 26024555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical bone mapping improves finite element strain prediction accuracy at the proximal femur.
    Schileo E; Pitocchi J; Falcinelli C; Taddei F
    Bone; 2020 Jul; 136():115348. PubMed ID: 32240847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of 3D shape, internal density and mechanics of proximal femur by combining bone mineral density images with shape and density templates.
    Väänänen SP; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jul; 11(6):791-800. PubMed ID: 21986796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.
    Chang G; Honig S; Brown R; Deniz CM; Egol KA; Babb JS; Regatte RR; Rajapakse CS
    Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):464-74. PubMed ID: 24689884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
    Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left-right differences in the proximal femur's strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study.
    Taddei F; Falcinelli C; Balistreri L; Henys P; Baruffaldi F; Sigurdsson S; Gudnason V; Harris TB; Dietzel R; Armbrecht G; Boutroy S; Schileo E
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Apr; 27(4):1519-1528. PubMed ID: 26576543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip.
    Dragomir-Daescu D; Op Den Buijs J; McEligot S; Dai Y; Entwistle RC; Salas C; Melton LJ; Bennet KE; Khosla S; Amin S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 39(2):742-55. PubMed ID: 21052839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
    Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing finite element predictions of local subchondral bone structural stiffness using neural network-derived density-modulus relationships for proximal tibial subchondral cortical and trabecular bone.
    Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Jan; 41():1-8. PubMed ID: 27842233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping anisotropy of the proximal femur for enhanced image based finite element analysis.
    Enns-Bray WS; Owoc JS; Nishiyama KK; Boyd SK
    J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3272-8. PubMed ID: 25219361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur.
    Wirtz DC; Pandorf T; Portheine F; Radermacher K; Schiffers N; Prescher A; Weichert D; Niethard FU
    J Biomech; 2003 Feb; 36(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 12547369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis predictions of femoral strength and stiffness depend on computed tomography settings.
    Dragomir-Daescu D; Salas C; Uthamaraj S; Rossman T
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 25442008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
    Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Reconstruction Kernel on Bone Mineral and Strength Estimates Using Quantitative Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis.
    Michalski AS; Edwards WB; Boyd SK
    J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29054559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated segmentation of cortical and trabecular bone to generate finite element models for femoral bone mechanics.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Venäläinen MS; Matikka H; Zheng Y; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Aug; 70():19-28. PubMed ID: 31280927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.