213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21159449)
1. Demographics and beef preferences affect consumer motivation for purchasing fresh beef steaks and roasts.
Reicks AL; Brooks JC; Garmyn AJ; Thompson LD; Lyford CL; Miller MF
Meat Sci; 2011 Apr; 87(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 21159449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks.
Behrends JM; Goodson KJ; Koohmaraie M; Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Wise JW; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 15705763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of clod steaks.
Goodson KJ; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Courington SM; Wise JW; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 2002 Feb; 80(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 11881929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride to beef and calf-fed Holstein cattle on consumer palatability ratings.
Mehaffey JM; Brooks JC; Rathmann RJ; Alsup EM; Hutcheson JP; Nichols WT; Streeter MN; Yates DA; Johnson BJ; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2009 Nov; 87(11):3712-21. PubMed ID: 19717772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consumer assessment of beef strip loin steaks of varying fat levels.
O'Quinn TG; Brooks JC; Polkinghorne RJ; Garmyn AJ; Johnson BJ; Starkey JD; Rathmann RJ; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):626-34. PubMed ID: 21948609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of calcium chloride-injected top sirloin steaks when given instructions for preparation.
Behrends JM; Goodson KJ; Koohmaraie M; Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Wise JW; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 2005 Dec; 83(12):2869-75. PubMed ID: 16282626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximate composition and energy content of beef steaks as influenced by USDA quality grade and degree of doneness.
Smith AM; Harris KB; Haneklaus AN; Savell JW
Meat Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 21663807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer assessment of beef tenderloin steaks from various USDA quality grades at 3 degrees of doneness.
O'Quinn TG; Brooks JC; Miller MF
J Food Sci; 2015 Feb; 80(2):S444-9. PubMed ID: 25597832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moisture enhancement and blade tenderization effects on the shear force and palatability of strip loin steaks from beef cattle fed zilpaterol hydrochloride.
Brooks JC; Mehaffey JM; Collins JA; Rogers HR; Legako J; Johnson BJ; Lawrence T; Allen DM; Streeter MN; Nichols WT; Hutcheson JP; Yates DA; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2010 May; 88(5):1809-16. PubMed ID: 20081069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of tenderness, palatability, and retail caselife of enhanced cow subprimals with nonenhanced cow and United States Department of Agriculture Select subprimals.
Rose MN; Garmyn AJ; Hilton GG; Morgan JB; VanOverbeke DL
J Anim Sci; 2010 Nov; 88(11):3683-92. PubMed ID: 20656978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of packaging atmospheres on beef instrumental tenderness, fresh color stability, and internal cooked color.
Grobbel JP; Dikeman ME; Hunt MC; Milliken GA
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1191-9. PubMed ID: 18245502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consumer attitudes towards beef and acceptability of enhanced beef.
Robbins K; Jensen J; Ryan KJ; Homco-Ryan C; McKeith FK; Brewer MS
Meat Sci; 2003 Oct; 65(2):721-9. PubMed ID: 22063433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cooking frozen and thawed roasts: beef, pork, and lamb cuts.
Fulton C; Davis C
J Am Diet Assoc; 1975 Sep; 67(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 1151028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. USA millennial and non-millennial beef consumers perception of beef, pork, and chicken.
Laird HL; Miller RK; Kerth CR; Berto MC; Adhikari K
Meat Sci; 2024 Aug; 214():109516. PubMed ID: 38678864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top sirloin steak.
Savell JW; Lorenzen CL; Neely TR; Miller RK; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Taylor JF; Buyck MJ; Reagan JO
J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 10229360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scandinavian consumer preference for beef steaks packed with or without oxygen.
Aaslyng MD; Tørngren MA; Madsen NT
Meat Sci; 2010 Jul; 85(3):519-24. PubMed ID: 20416824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top loin steak.
Lorenzen CL; Neely TR; Miller RK; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Taylor JF; Buyck MJ; Reagan JO; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 10229359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of cluster analysis and preference mapping to evaluate consumer acceptability of choice and select bovine M. longissimus lumborum steaks cooked to various end-point temperatures.
Schmidt TB; Schilling MW; Behrends JM; Battula V; Jackson V; Sekhon RK; Lawrence TE
Meat Sci; 2010 Jan; 84(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 20374753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interrelationships of breed type, USDA quality grade, cooking method, and degree of doneness on consumer evaluations of beef in Dallas and San Antonio, Texas, USA.
McKenna DR; Lorenzen CL; Pollok KD; Morgan WW; Mies WL; Harris JJ; Murphy R; McAdams M; Hale DS; Savell JW
Meat Sci; 2004 Feb; 66(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 22064143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
