143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21159683)
1. Vaginal misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device: an RCT.
Dijkhuizen K; Dekkers OM; Holleboom CA; de Groot CJ; Hellebrekers BW; van Roosmalen GJ; Janssen CA; Helmerhorst FM
Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb; 26(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 21159683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
Sääv I; Aronsson A; Marions L; Stephansson O; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Hum Reprod; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2647-52. PubMed ID: 17652452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of vaginal administration of misoprostol before intrauterine contraceptive insertion following previous insertion failure: a double blind RCT.
Bahamondes MV; Espejo-Arce X; Bahamondes L
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1861-6. PubMed ID: 26040478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-administered misoprostol or placebo before intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
Swenson C; Turok DK; Ward K; Jacobson JC; Dermish A
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):341-7. PubMed ID: 22825094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Self-administration of misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion among nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
Lathrop E; Haddad L; McWhorter CP; Goedken P
Contraception; 2013 Dec; 88(6):725-9. PubMed ID: 24034580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of prophylactic misoprostol administration prior to intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women.
Edelman AB; Schaefer E; Olson A; Van Houten L; Bednarek P; Leclair C; Jensen JT
Contraception; 2011 Sep; 84(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 21843686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.
Abdellah MS; Abbas AM; Hegazy AM; El-Nashar IM
Contraception; 2017 Jun; 95(6):538-543. PubMed ID: 28088498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misoprostol prior to inserting an intrauterine device in nulligravidas: a randomized clinical trial.
Scavuzzi A; Souza AS; Costa AA; Amorim MM
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2118-25. PubMed ID: 23739219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol vs Vaginal Dinoprostone Administered 3 Hours Prior to Copper T380A Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ashour ASA; El Sharkawy M; Ali AS; Keshta NHA; Shatat HBAE; El Mahy M
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 33(5):559-565. PubMed ID: 32330638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol.
Colón I; Clawson K; Hunter K; Druzin ML; Taslimi MM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):747-52. PubMed ID: 15746667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening PRIOR TO manual vacuum aspiration under local anaesthesia: a randomized study.
Caliskan E; Filiz T; Yucesoy G; Coskun E; Vural B; Corakci A
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2007 Dec; 12(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 17853158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sublingual versus vaginal route of misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to surgical termination of first trimester abortions.
Saxena P; Salhan S; Sarda N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Mar; 125(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 16139942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for second trimester abortion: randomized controlled equivalence trial.
von Hertzen H; Piaggio G; Wojdyla D; Nguyen TM; Marions L; Okoev G; Khomassuridze A; Kereszturi A; Mittal S; Nair R; Daver R; Pretnar-Darovec A; Dickson K; Nguyen DH; Nguyen HB; Hoang TD; Peregoudov A;
Hum Reprod; 2009 Jan; 24(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 18794161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal misoprostol before copper IUD insertion after previous insertion failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomised clinical trial.
Rasheedy R; Tamara TF; Allam IS; Abbas AM; Essam El-Din Abd El Salam N; Ferhad Ahmed A
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Jun; 24(3):222-226. PubMed ID: 31112079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before manual vacuum aspiration of first trimester pregnancy under local anesthesia: a randomized placebo-controlled study.
Cakir L; Dilbaz B; Caliskan E; Dede FS; Dilbaz S; Haberal A
Contraception; 2005 May; 71(5):337-42. PubMed ID: 15854633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
