These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21161193)

  • 21. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ERP correlates of dual mechanisms of control in the counting Stroop task.
    West R; Bailey K
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Oct; 49(10):1309-18. PubMed ID: 22958264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural markers for immediate performance accuracy in a Stroop color-word matching task: an event-related potentials analysis.
    Shou G; Ding L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():6222-5. PubMed ID: 25571418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Strategic control over extent and timing of distractor-based response activation.
    Jost K; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Löw A; Jacobsen T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):326-333. PubMed ID: 27732019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modulations of the executive control network by stimulus onset asynchrony in a Stroop task.
    Coderre EL; van Heuven WJ
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 14():79. PubMed ID: 23902451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading.
    Wlotko EW; Federmeier KD
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():20-32. PubMed ID: 25987437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stimulus and response conflict in the color-word Stroop task: a combined electro-myography and event-related potential study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():63-76. PubMed ID: 20153298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect.
    Appelbaum LG; Meyerhoff KL; Woldorff MG
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2508-21. PubMed ID: 19321654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.
    Caldas AL; Machado-Pinheiro W; Daneyko O; Riggio L
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1815-1828. PubMed ID: 31030272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Event-related potentials to Stroop and reverse Stroop stimuli.
    Atkinson CM; Drysdale KA; Fulham WR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Jan; 47(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 12543443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ERPs predict the appearance of visual stimuli in a temporal selection task.
    Niedeggen M; Hesselmann G; Sahraie A; Milders M
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 16730675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The dynamics of proactive and reactive cognitive control processes in the human brain.
    Appelbaum LG; Boehler CN; Davis LA; Won RJ; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):1021-38. PubMed ID: 24345171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: an ERP study.
    Gootjes L; Coppens LC; Zwaan RA; Franken IH; Van Strien JW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Mar; 79(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 21156188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dissociated stimulus and response conflict effect in the Stroop task: evidence from evoked brain potentials and brain oscillations.
    Zhao J; Liang WK; Juan CH; Wang L; Wang S; Zhu Z
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():130-8. PubMed ID: 25511611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Single-trial classification of neural responses evoked in rapid serial visual presentation: effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and stimulus repetition.
    Cecotti H; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():1282-5. PubMed ID: 25570200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the partial contribution of the P3 event-related potential elicited by auditory oddball stimuli during the Stroop task.
    Swerdloff MM; Hargrove LJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38082899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task.
    Ilan AB; Polich J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Feb; 110(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 10210626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of mild head injury on event-related potential correlates of Stroop task performance.
    Potter DD; Jory SH; Bassett MR; Barrett K; Mychalkiw W
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2002 Sep; 8(6):828-37. PubMed ID: 12240747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.