BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21161526)

  • 1. The route to best science in implementation of the Endangered Species Act's consultation mandate: the benefits of structured effects analysis.
    Murphy DD; Weiland PS
    Environ Manage; 2011 Feb; 47(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 21161526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidance on the Use of Best Available Science under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Murphy DD; Weiland PS
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jul; 58(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 27085854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The endangered species act: science, policy, and politics.
    Bean MJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():369-91. PubMed ID: 19432657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data contradict common perceptions about a controversial provision of the US Endangered Species Act.
    Malcom JW; Li YW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Dec; 112(52):15844-9. PubMed ID: 26668392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
    Himes Boor GK
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive management on the central Platte River--science, engineering, and decision analysis to assist in the recovery of four species.
    Smith CB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 May; 92(5):1414-9. PubMed ID: 20971546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Climate change, marine environments, and the US Endangered species act.
    Seney EE; Rowland MJ; Lowery RA; Griffis RB; McClure MM
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1138-46. PubMed ID: 24299080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Species listing under Canada's Species at Risk Act.
    Findlay CS; Elgie S; Giles B; Burr L
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1609-17. PubMed ID: 19500120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning.
    Gregory R; Long G; Colligan M; Geiger JG; Laser M
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 105():30-43. PubMed ID: 22516871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compliance of Australian threatened species recovery plans with legislative requirements.
    Ortega-Argueta A; Baxter G; Hockings M
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Aug; 92(8):2054-60. PubMed ID: 21507558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybridization, agency discretion, and implementation of the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Lind-Riehl JF; Mayer AL; Wellstead AM; Gailing O
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1288-1296. PubMed ID: 27113272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Navy sonar, cetaceans and the US Supreme Court: a review of cetacean mitigation and litigation in the US.
    Zirbel K; Balint P; Parsons EC
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011; 63(1-4):40-8. PubMed ID: 21507427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critical assessment of the use of surrogate species in conservation planning in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California (U.S.A.).
    Murphy DD; Weiland PS; Cummins KW
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21790783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic data and the listing of species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Fallon SM
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1186-95. PubMed ID: 17883484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of information availability on assessment and designation of species at risk.
    Lukey JR; Crawford SS; Gillis D
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1398-406. PubMed ID: 20666804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species.
    Camaclang AE; Maron M; Martin TG; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):482-92. PubMed ID: 25472827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the risks of pesticides to threatened and endangered species using population modeling: A critical review and recommendations for future work.
    Forbes VE; Galic N; Schmolke A; Vavra J; Pastorok R; Thorbek P
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Aug; 35(8):1904-13. PubMed ID: 27037541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addressing climate change threats to endangered species in U.S. recovery plans.
    Povilitis A; Suckling K
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 20184656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.