206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21161841)
1. Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition.
Manninen BA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):33-46. PubMed ID: 21161841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A supportive yet critical response to "Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition".
Liebegott K
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):61-3. PubMed ID: 21161851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion: rights, responsibilities, obligations.
Walsh KP
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):63-4. PubMed ID: 21161852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.
Manninen BA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21161830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion, secular dogma, and the sacrament of sex: another failed attempt to impose moral idiosyncrasies through the ruse of argument.
Trotter G
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):51-2. PubMed ID: 21161845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What human life amendments mean and don't mean.
Murphy TF
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):47-8. PubMed ID: 21161842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Let's rethink Roe v. Wade--and overturn it.
Mulder J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 21161853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Manninen's defense of abortion rights is unsuccessful.
Marquis D
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):56-7. PubMed ID: 21161848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and moral arguments from analogy.
Nobis N; Jarr-Koroma AS
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):59-61. PubMed ID: 21161850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The unacknowledged consensus on abortion.
Watson K
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):57-9. PubMed ID: 21161849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetuses are neither violinists nor violators.
Eberl JT
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):53-4. PubMed ID: 21161846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
Callahan D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion as health care.
Hill BJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):48-9. PubMed ID: 21161843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
Morgan RG
Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment.
Westfall D
Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion law should align with evidence from neuroscience.
Perry C; Felsen G
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 21161844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
Stith R
William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The women of Roe v. Wade.
Glendon MA
Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
