These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21161841)

  • 21. Pregnancy is not a crime.
    Flicker LS
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):54-5. PubMed ID: 21161847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unborn children as constitutional persons.
    Roden GJ
    Issues Law Med; 2010; 25(3):185-273. PubMed ID: 20443281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
    Segers MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 2603862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Abortion rights: why conservatives are wrong.
    Edwards RB
    Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):19, 21, 23. PubMed ID: 16100837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is there life after Roe v. Wade?
    Mahowald MB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):22-9. PubMed ID: 2663777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Justice and the fetus: Rawls, children, and abortion.
    Shaw DM
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Jan; 20(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 21223613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
    Swyers MH
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
    Goldman EB
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rewriting Roe v. Wade.
    Regan DH
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1569-646. PubMed ID: 10245966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anti-abortion movement.
    Wilson K
    Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12340405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is there life after Roe? How to think about the fetus.
    Kissling F
    Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):10-8. PubMed ID: 16538752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gestational burdens and fetal status: justifying Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA
    Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):189-212. PubMed ID: 3333215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court?
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Mar; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12698761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.