198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21161842)
1. What human life amendments mean and don't mean.
Murphy TF
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):47-8. PubMed ID: 21161842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition.
Manninen BA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):33-46. PubMed ID: 21161841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manninen's defense of abortion rights is unsuccessful.
Marquis D
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):56-7. PubMed ID: 21161848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Let's rethink Roe v. Wade--and overturn it.
Mulder J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 21161853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A supportive yet critical response to "Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition".
Liebegott K
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):61-3. PubMed ID: 21161851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The unacknowledged consensus on abortion.
Watson K
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):57-9. PubMed ID: 21161849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion: rights, responsibilities, obligations.
Walsh KP
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):63-4. PubMed ID: 21161852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion as health care.
Hill BJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):48-9. PubMed ID: 21161843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and moral arguments from analogy.
Nobis N; Jarr-Koroma AS
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):59-61. PubMed ID: 21161850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion law should align with evidence from neuroscience.
Perry C; Felsen G
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 21161844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetuses are neither violinists nor violators.
Eberl JT
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):53-4. PubMed ID: 21161846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.
Manninen BA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21161830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion, secular dogma, and the sacrament of sex: another failed attempt to impose moral idiosyncrasies through the ruse of argument.
Trotter G
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):51-2. PubMed ID: 21161845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion rights: why conservatives are wrong.
Edwards RB
Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):19, 21, 23. PubMed ID: 16100837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
Witherspoon JP
Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
Van Detta JA
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of the unborn--introduction of a joint resolution.
Buckley JL
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 May; 119(82):S9973-92. PubMed ID: 11663377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
Jubb ED
Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
