These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21161842)

  • 21. Senate Joint Resolution 10 and Senate Joint Resolution 11--right to life amendments.
    Buckley J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Jan; 121(7):S651-72. PubMed ID: 11663644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abortion in America: is compromise possible?
    Hodges SA
    J Legal Stud; 1999-2000; 10():175-89. PubMed ID: 15991406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
    Destro RA
    Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Introduction of S.J. Res. 140 and S.J. Res. 141.
    Buckley J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Oct; 121(153):S18193-214. PubMed ID: 11663650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill.
    Ruf BA
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
    Davis PC; Gilligan C
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics.
    Tatalovich R; Daynes BW
    Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights.
    Dailard C
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Proposed right of life amendment to the Constitution.
    Helms Je
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1976 Apr; 122(60):S6116-42. PubMed ID: 11663749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
    Segers MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Confronting objections to an anti-abortion amendment.
    Byrn RM
    America (NY); 1976 Jun; 134(24):529-34. PubMed ID: 11664690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Supreme Court's abortion decisions and public opinion in the United States.
    Blake J
    Popul Dev Rev; 1977; 3(1-2):45-62. PubMed ID: 11664824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion and the Hatch Amendment.
    Bryce E
    America (NY); 1982 Mar; 146(9):166-8. PubMed ID: 11658309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The abortion amendments: policy in the light of precedent.
    Byrn RM
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1974; 18(3):380-406. PubMed ID: 11663524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Resignation of US judge puts reproductive rights at risk.
    Hopkins Tanne J
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7509):130. PubMed ID: 16020851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth.
    Scott R
    Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):265-325. PubMed ID: 16733877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Roe and the new frontier.
    Roy LS
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 2003; 27(1):339-83. PubMed ID: 15568255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.