136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21161846)
21. Abortion law should align with evidence from neuroscience.
Perry C; Felsen G
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 21161844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Lesbians and abortion.
Robson R
Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
Stith R
William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Nordholm S
MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Protection of RU-486 as contraception, emergency contraception and as an abortifacient under the law of contraception.
Wyser-Pratte RC
Oregon Law Rev; 2000; 79(4):1121-56. PubMed ID: 12452141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The partial death of abortion rights.
Charo RA
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
Grant ER
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
Weitz TA; Yanow S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is there life after Roe? How to think about the fetus.
Kissling F
Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):10-8. PubMed ID: 16538752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion.
Greene MF
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
Swyers MH
Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Must we really make the case for abortion rights all over again?
Forde C
Conscience; 2005; 26(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 16639810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
Moses MF
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
Ching B
Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The argument that never ends.
Simon R
US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cardinal Bernardin on the "forgotten factor" and other gaps in the abortion debate.
Stahel TH
America (NY); 1990 Apr; 162(13):354-6. PubMed ID: 15991413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Poppema ST
MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Gartner EC
MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
