These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21161846)
41. The Supreme Court and abortion rights. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. God's littlest children and the right to live: the case for a positivist pro-life overturning of Roe. Marcin RB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2008; 25(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 19137746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Hope, healing, and justice in the abortion debate. Vogel A Ethics Med; 2000; 16(3):86-90. PubMed ID: 15040348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women. Curran WJ Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1983; 61(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 6343918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The constitutionality of abortion on request in South Africa. McGregor M; Moore R E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E3. PubMed ID: 16967565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart. Borgmann CE Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. US pro-choice groups prepare for fight over Supreme Court nominee. Tanne JH BMJ; 2004 Nov; 329(7477):1254. PubMed ID: 15564237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The women of Roe v. Wade. Glendon MA Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law. Morgan RG Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test. Burdick R Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Our bodies, our choices: Australian law on foetal personhood. Anolak H Women Birth; 2015 Mar; 28(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 25458964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Access to abortion in the USA-the legal battle. Cleaver G Lancet; 2017 Jun; 389(10087):2361-2362. PubMed ID: 28635601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Informed consent and the First Amendment. Mariner WK; Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1285-7. PubMed ID: 25830420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt. Harv Law Rev; 2016 Nov; 130(1):397-406. PubMed ID: 28117562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Forty years of legal abortion: now it's time to review the law. Furedi A J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2007 Jul; 33(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 17609069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Pevsner WJ MedGenMed; 2007 Aug; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18092047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]