BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21161847)

  • 1. Pregnancy is not a crime.
    Flicker LS
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):54-5. PubMed ID: 21161847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.
    Manninen BA
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21161830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion and moral arguments from analogy.
    Nobis N; Jarr-Koroma AS
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):59-61. PubMed ID: 21161850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion: rights, responsibilities, obligations.
    Walsh KP
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):63-4. PubMed ID: 21161852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion, secular dogma, and the sacrament of sex: another failed attempt to impose moral idiosyncrasies through the ruse of argument.
    Trotter G
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):51-2. PubMed ID: 21161845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manninen's defense of abortion rights is unsuccessful.
    Marquis D
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):56-7. PubMed ID: 21161848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition.
    Manninen BA
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):33-46. PubMed ID: 21161841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Let's rethink Roe v. Wade--and overturn it.
    Mulder J
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 21161853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A supportive yet critical response to "Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition".
    Liebegott K
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):61-3. PubMed ID: 21161851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetuses are neither violinists nor violators.
    Eberl JT
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):53-4. PubMed ID: 21161846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The unacknowledged consensus on abortion.
    Watson K
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):57-9. PubMed ID: 21161849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion law should align with evidence from neuroscience.
    Perry C; Felsen G
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 21161844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion as health care.
    Hill BJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):48-9. PubMed ID: 21161843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion, metaphysics and morality: a review of Francis Beckwith's defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice.
    Nobis N
    J Med Philos; 2011 Jun; 36(3):261-73. PubMed ID: 21597083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What human life amendments mean and don't mean.
    Murphy TF
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):47-8. PubMed ID: 21161842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Justice and the fetus: Rawls, children, and abortion.
    Shaw DM
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Jan; 20(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 21223613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical notice--defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith.
    Stretton D
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):793-7. PubMed ID: 18974412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion: from the perspective of responsibility.
    Gardner EC
    Perkins J; 1977; 30(3):10-28. PubMed ID: 11658311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods of aborting.
    Perry C
    Reason Pap; 1986; 11():63-7. PubMed ID: 16100822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioethics and the law--the impact of genetic technology on prenatal management.
    McGivern B
    E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E9. PubMed ID: 16969924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.