These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21162433)

  • 1. Understanding evidence-based research methods: reliability and validity considerations in survey research.
    Etchegaray JM; Fischer WG
    HERD; 2010; 4(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 21162433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Principles of survey development for telemedicine applications.
    Demiris G
    J Telemed Telecare; 2006; 12(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 16638231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The quality of the survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences is questionable].
    Watt Boolsen M; Plum LM; Hillingsø JG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(35):1954-7. PubMed ID: 23978118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Telltale heart skips a few beats: challenging conclusions of EMS customer satisfaction.
    Schears RM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Feb; 11(2):214; author reply 214-5. PubMed ID: 14759972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of drug dependents' self-reports.
    Phelps DL; Cottler LB; Compton WM
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1998 Jan; 49(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 9543653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and Validity of the Spiritual Care-Giving Scale in a Turkish Population.
    İpek Çoban G; Şirin M; Yurttaş A
    J Relig Health; 2017 Feb; 56(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 26194169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research.
    Kelley K; Clark B; Brown V; Sitzia J
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Jun; 15(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 12803354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing patient satisfaction across the continuum of ambulatory care: a revalidation and validation of care-specific surveys.
    Seibert JH; Brien JS; Maaske BL; Kochurka K; Feldt K; Fader L; Race KE
    J Ambul Care Manage; 1999 Apr; 22(2):9-26. PubMed ID: 10387587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.
    Dykema J; Jones NR; Piché T; Stevenson J
    Eval Health Prof; 2013 Sep; 36(3):352-81. PubMed ID: 23975760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Unfair criticism of the Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences].
    Miiller MM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(35):1982. PubMed ID: 26491741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How reliable are surveys of client satisfaction with healthcare services? Evidence from matched facility and household data in Madagascar.
    Glick P
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Jan; 68(2):368-79. PubMed ID: 19027216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability issues in published public health and social policy research.
    Lewis DM; Cuevas NM
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 10162902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of ENT consultant postal questionnaires.
    Ramphul N; Saunders J; Ahmed I; Fenton JE
    J Laryngol Otol; 2005 Mar; 119(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 15845186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Researching the reliability of accreditation survey teams: lessons learnt when things went awry.
    Greenfield D; Pawsey M; Naylor J; Braithwaite J
    Health Inf Manag; 2013; 42(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 23640917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (Chinese version).
    Lee DT; Thompson DR; Yu DS; Woo J
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 May; 53(5):920-1. PubMed ID: 15877586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conducting Internet-based HIV/STD prevention survey research: considerations in design and evaluation.
    Pequegnat W; Rosser BR; Bowen AM; Bull SS; DiClemente RJ; Bockting WO; Elford J; Fishbein M; Gurak L; Horvath K; Konstan J; Noar SM; Ross MW; Sherr L; Spiegel D; Zimmerman R
    AIDS Behav; 2007 Jul; 11(4):505-21. PubMed ID: 17053853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Reply: Our criticism is relevant].
    Hillingsø J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(35):1983. PubMed ID: 26491742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Giving voice to the vulnerable: the development of a CAHPS nursing home survey measuring family members' experiences.
    Frentzel EM; Sangl JA; Evensen CT; Cosenza C; Brown JA; Keller S; Garfinkel SA
    Med Care; 2012 Nov; 50 Suppl():S20-7. PubMed ID: 23064273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Improved questionnaire concerning the Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences].
    Watt Boolsen M; Plum LM; Hillingsø JG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(35):1958-61. PubMed ID: 23978119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey.
    Van Teijlingen ER; Rennie AM; Hundley V; Graham W
    J Adv Nurs; 2001 May; 34(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 11328433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.